Literature DB >> 11867381

The neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular block monitoring.

Ashraf A Dahaba1, Fedor von Klobucar, Peter H Rehak, Werner F List.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The neuromuscular transmission module (M-NMT) is an integrated piezoelectric motion sensor module incorporated in the AS/3(TM) anesthesia monitor. We compared the neuromuscular block of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (twice the 95% effective dose) monitored by the M-NMT with that monitored by the Relaxometer mechanomyograph (MMG). The two monitors were alternately allocated to the left or right hands of 20 patients. T(1)%, the first twitch of the train-of-four (TOF), and the TOF ratio (T(4)/T(1)) were used for evaluating the neuromuscular block. There was no significant difference in the mean (min) plus minus SD onset time or time to 0.8 TOF ratio recovery measured by the M-NMT (1.5 plus/minus 0.3, 49.4 plus/minus 8.1) compared with MMG (1.8 plus/minus 0.6, 50.9 plus/minus 9.9), respectively. However, the time (min) to 25% T(1) recovery was significantly longer when monitored by the M-NMT (25.6 plus/minus 8) than by the MMG (20.2 plus/minus 6.3). During recovery from neuromuscular block, the difference between the TOF ratios measured by the two monitors showed a bias of -0.031, and the limits of agreement (bias plus/minus 1.96 SD) were -0.281 and +0.22. The M-NMT monitor could determine the time to tracheal intubation as well as full recovery from neuromuscular block, but it lagged behind the MMG in determining the time to rocuronium repeat dose administration. IMPLICATIONS: Compared with the Relaxometer mechanomyograph, the neuromuscular transmission module could equally indicate time to tracheal intubation and full recovery from 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium neuromuscular block. Its small quick-fit sensor has the advantage, in an often crowded and busy operating room, of being incorporated in the AS/3(TM) anesthesia workstation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11867381     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Mindray 3-directional NMT Module (a new generation "Tri-axial" neuromuscular monitor) versus the Relaxometer mechanomyograph and versus the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyograph.

Authors:  Ashraf A Dahaba; Ismet Suljevic; Zhao Yang Xiao; Kun Wang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Survey of muscle relaxant effects management with a kinemyographic-based data archiving system: a retrospective quantitative and contextual quality control approach.

Authors:  Cyrus Motamed; Jean Louis Bourgain; Alain D'Hollander
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of train-of-four ratios measured with Datex-Ohmeda's M-NMT MechanoSensor™ and M-NMT ElectroSensor™.

Authors:  Jarno Salminen; Mark van Gils; Markku Paloheimo; Arvi Yli-Hankala
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Lateral spread response monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Comparison of two targets of partial neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  Y H Chung; W H Kim; J J Lee; S-I Yang; S H Lim; D W Seo; K Park; I S Chung
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  The construction and evaluation of a device for mechanomyography in anaesthetized Göttingen minipigs.

Authors:  R Eddie Clutton; Kosala Dissanayake; Holly Lawson; Keith Simpson; Adrian Thompson; Michael Eddleston
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 1.648

6.  Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain.

Authors:  D John Doyle; Ashraf A Dahaba; Yannick LeManach
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.