Literature DB >> 11867248

The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects.

Markus Kiefer1.   

Abstract

It is a matter of debate whether the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) is sensitive to unconscious automatic priming mechanisms or to strategic mechanisms only. Recent studies demonstrated N400 modulation by masked primes at a short SOA supporting an automatic spreading activation account. However, it cannot be ruled out that strategic mechanisms based upon partial prime identification contributed to the observed priming effects. The present study was set up to substantiate masked N400 priming effects as an index of automatic spreading activation. It was assessed whether partial identification of the masked words due to backward priming could have supported strategic priming to occur. In experiment 1, ERPs were recorded while subjects performed lexical decisions on targets preceded by masked and unmasked primes at an SOA of 67 ms. Masked words, which were not consciously perceived, as well as visible words were shown to modulate the N400 to meaningfully related target words. Experiment 2 required subjects to perform decisions on visual, lexical and semantic features of masked words presented with or without semantically related context words. Subjects performed at chance in all tasks. Furthermore, the results exclude the possibility that backward priming has rendered the masked words partially visible. The present study therefore demonstrates that N400 priming effects can be reliably obtained from unconsciously perceived masked words at a very short SOA and strengthens the notion that the N400 is modulated by automatic spreading activation and not exclusively by strategic semantic processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11867248     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00085-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  84 in total

1.  Conditional automaticity in subliminal morphosyntactic priming.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Bert Reynvoet; Jessica Hendler; Lennart Oettl; Stefan Evert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-06-12

2.  Differential age effects on lexical ambiguity resolution mechanisms.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  On the automaticity of relational stimulus processing.

Authors:  Niclas Heider; Adriaan Spruyt; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-02

4.  A direct intracranial record of emotions evoked by subliminal words.

Authors:  Lionel Naccache; Raphaël Gaillard; Claude Adam; Dominique Hasboun; Stéphane Clémenceau; Michel Baulac; Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The role of action representations in visual object recognition.

Authors:  Hannah Barbara Helbig; Markus Graf; Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multiple sources of positive- and negative-priming effects: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Henning Gibbons; Thomas H Rammsayer; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

7.  An electrophysiological investigation of indirect semantic priming.

Authors:  Donna A Kreher; Phillip J Holcomb; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking.

Authors:  Sid Kouider; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Masked Repetition Priming in Treatment of Anomia: A Phase 2 Study.

Authors:  JoAnn P Silkes
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Masked repetition and translation priming in second language learners: a window on the time-course of form and meaning activation using erps.

Authors:  Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.