CONTEXT: Budgetary constraints in tuberculosis (TB) control programs require streamlining contact investigations without sacrificing disease control. OBJECTIVE: To develop more efficient methods of TB contact investigation by creating a model of TB transmission using variables that best predict a positive tuberculin skin test among contacts of an active TB case. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: After standardizing the interview and documentation process, data were collected on 292 consecutive TB cases and their 2941 contacts identified by the Alabama Department of Public Health between January and October 1998. Generalized estimating equations were used to create a model for predicting positive skin test results in contacts of active TB cases. The model was then validated using data from a prospective cohort of 366 new TB cases and their 3162 contacts identified between October 1998 and April 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tuberculin skin test result. RESULTS: Using generalized estimating equations to build a predictive model, 7 variables were found to significantly predict a positive tuberculin skin test result among contacts of an active TB case. Further testing showed this model to have a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of approximately 89%, 36%, and 26%, respectively. The false-negative rate was less than 10%, and about 40% of the contact workload could be eliminated using this model. CONCLUSIONS: Certain characteristics can be used to predict contacts most likely to have a positive tuberculin skin test result. Use of such models can significantly reduce the number of contacts that public health officials need to investigate while still maintaining excellent disease control.
CONTEXT: Budgetary constraints in tuberculosis (TB) control programs require streamlining contact investigations without sacrificing disease control. OBJECTIVE: To develop more efficient methods of TB contact investigation by creating a model of TB transmission using variables that best predict a positive tuberculin skin test among contacts of an active TB case. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: After standardizing the interview and documentation process, data were collected on 292 consecutive TB cases and their 2941 contacts identified by the Alabama Department of Public Health between January and October 1998. Generalized estimating equations were used to create a model for predicting positive skin test results in contacts of active TB cases. The model was then validated using data from a prospective cohort of 366 new TB cases and their 3162 contacts identified between October 1998 and April 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tuberculin skin test result. RESULTS: Using generalized estimating equations to build a predictive model, 7 variables were found to significantly predict a positive tuberculin skin test result among contacts of an active TB case. Further testing showed this model to have a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of approximately 89%, 36%, and 26%, respectively. The false-negative rate was less than 10%, and about 40% of the contact workload could be eliminated using this model. CONCLUSIONS: Certain characteristics can be used to predict contacts most likely to have a positive tuberculin skin test result. Use of such models can significantly reduce the number of contacts that public health officials need to investigate while still maintaining excellent disease control.
Authors: L B Gerald; F Bruce; C M Brooks; N Brook; M E Kimerling; R A Windsor; W C Bailey Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: James D Mancuso; David Tribble; Gerald H Mazurek; Yuanzhang Li; Cara Olsen; Naomi E Aronson; Lawrence Geiter; Donald Goodwin; Lisa W Keep Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Christopher C Whalen; Allan Chiunda; Sarah Zalwango; Lorna Nshuti; Edward Jones-Lopez; Alphonse Okwera; Christina Hirsch; Pierre Peters; W Henry Boom; Roy D Mugerwa Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Michael E Urbanowski; Elizabeth A Ihms; Kristina Bigelow; André Kübler; Paul T Elkington; William R Bishai Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: M A Pagaoa; R A Royce; M P Chen; J E Golub; A L Davidow; Y Hirsch-Moverman; S M Marks; L D Teeter; P M Thickstun; D J Katz Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Nancy E Dunlap; Kerry H Lok; William H Benjamin; Nancy B Keenan; Michael E Kimerling Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.948