Literature DB >> 11866494

Vacuum-assisted delivery.

Aldo Vacca1.   

Abstract

Unsuccessful vacuum extraction, cup detachment and failed anterior rotation in occipitoposterior positions are commonly associated with obstetric factors that are avoidable or correctable. These factors include the preferential use of soft vacuum cups, incorrect cup applications and attempts to deliver with the vacuum extractor before the cervix is completely dilated. Evidence from randomized trials demonstrates that soft cups cause fewer cosmetic effects and scalp lacerations than rigid cups. Soft cups do not reduce the incidence of cephalhaematomas nor have they been shown to provide any advantage over rigid cups for the prevention of subgaleal haemorrhage. Clinically significant subgaleal haemorrhage and intracranial injury are almost always preceded by difficult vacuum extraction. Although the vacuum extractor is less likely than forceps to injure the mother's genital tract and anal sphincters at delivery, no significant differences have been demonstrated between the instruments in terms of subsequent urinary or bowel disturbances. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11866494     DOI: 10.1053/beog.2001.0252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  6 in total

1.  Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  N Prapas; I Kalogiannidis; S Masoura; E Diamanti; A Makedos; D Drossou; G Makedos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Comparison of Obstetric Efficacy and Safety of the Kiwi OmniCup with Conventional Vacuum Extraction.

Authors:  W Siggelkow; N Schwarz; M W Beckmann; S Kehl; F Faschingbauer; R L Schild
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Preterm birth by vacuum extraction and neonatal outcome: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Katarina Åberg; Mikael Norman; Cecilia Ekéus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Simulation training program for vacuum application to improve technical skills in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Paolo Mannella; Mario Giordano; Maria Magdalena Montt Guevara; Andrea Giannini; Eleonora Russo; Federica Pancetti; Marta Caretto; Tommaso Simoncini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Can the cervical length in mid-trimester predict the use of vacuum in vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Jee Yoon Park; Sun Min Kim; Jeenah Sohn; Sejin Kim; Eunjin Song; Byoung Jae Kim; Hye Won Jeon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-26

6.  Comparison of a practice-based versus theory-based training program for conducting vacuum-assisted deliveries: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Julian Marschalek; Lorenz Kuessel; Maria Stammler-Safar; Herbert Kiss; Johannes Ott; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.