Literature DB >> 11866462

Evidence for "pre-recruitment" as a new mechanism of transcription activation in Escherichia coli: the large excess of SoxS binding sites per cell relative to the number of SoxS molecules per cell.

Kevin L Griffith1, Ishita M Shah, Todd E Myers, Michael C O'Neill, Richard E Wolf.   

Abstract

In response to the oxidative stress imposed by redox-cycling compounds like paraquat, Escherichia coli induces the synthesis of SoxS, which then activates the transcription of approximately 100 genes. The DNA binding site for SoxS-dependent transcription activation, the "soxbox," is highly degenerate, suggesting that the genome contains a large number of SoxS binding sites. To estimate the number of soxboxes in the cell, we searched the E. coli genome for SoxS binding sites using as query sequence the previously determined optimal SoxS binding sequence. We found approximately 12,500 sequences that match the optimal binding sequence under the conditions of our search; this agrees with our previous estimate, based on information theory, that a random sequence the size of the E. coli genome contains approximately 13,000 soxboxes. Thus, fast-growing cells with 4-6 genomes per cell have approximately 65,000 soxboxes. This large number of potential SoxS binding sites per cell raises the interesting question of how SoxS distinguishes between the functional soxboxes located within the promoters of target genes and the plethora of equivalent but nonfunctional binding sites scattered throughout the chromosome. To address this question, we treated cells with paraquat and used Western blot analysis to determine the kinetics of SoxS accumulation per cell; we also determined the kinetics of SoxS-activated gene expression. The abundance of SoxS reached a maximum of 2,500 molecules per cell 20 min after induction and gradually declined to approximately 500 molecules per cell over the next 1.5 h. Given that activation of target gene expression began almost immediately and given the large disparity between the number of SoxS molecules per cell, 2,500, and the number of SoxS binding sites per cell, 65,000, we infer that SoxS is not likely to activate transcription by the usual "recruitment" pathway, as this mechanism would require a number of SoxS molecules similar to the number of soxboxes. Instead, we propose that SoxS first interacts in solution with RNA polymerase and then the binary complex scans the chromosome for promoters that contain a soxbox properly positioned and oriented for transcription activation. We name this new pathway "pre-recruitment."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11866462     DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  26 in total

1.  Transient XylR binding to the UAS of the Pseudomonas putida sigma54 promoter Pu revealed with high intensity UV footprinting in vivo.

Authors:  Marc Valls; Víctor de Lorenzo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Transcriptional activation by MarA, SoxS and Rob of two tolC promoters using one binding site: a complex promoter configuration for tolC in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Aixia Zhang; Judah L Rosner; Robert G Martin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Residue substitutions near the redox center of Bacillus subtilis Spx affect RNA polymerase interaction, redox control, and Spx-DNA contact at a conserved cis-acting element.

Authors:  Ann A Lin; Don Walthers; Peter Zuber
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Mechanisms and evolution of control logic in prokaryotic transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Sacha A F T van Hijum; Marnix H Medema; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Activation of the Escherichia coli marA/soxS/rob regulon in response to transcriptional activator concentration.

Authors:  Robert G Martin; Emily S Bartlett; Judah L Rosner; Michael E Wall
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Redefining fundamental concepts of transcription initiation in bacteria.

Authors:  Citlalli Mejía-Almonte; Stephen J W Busby; Joseph T Wade; Jacques van Helden; Adam P Arkin; Gary D Stormo; Karen Eilbeck; Bernhard O Palsson; James E Galagan; Julio Collado-Vides
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Structural and Biochemical Studies of Non-native Agonists of the LasR Quorum-Sensing Receptor Reveal an L3 Loop "Out" Conformation for LasR.

Authors:  Matthew C O'Reilly; Shi-Hui Dong; Francis M Rossi; Kaleigh M Karlen; Rohan S Kumar; Satish K Nair; Helen E Blackwell
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 8.116

8.  Two functions of the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Rob: mediating "sequestration-dispersal" as a novel off-on switch for regulating Rob's activity as a transcription activator and preventing degradation of Rob by Lon protease.

Authors:  Kevin L Griffith; M Megan Fitzpatrick; Edward F Keen; Richard E Wolf
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Roles of effectors in XylS-dependent transcription activation: intramolecular domain derepression and DNA binding.

Authors:  Patricia Domínguez-Cuevas; Patricia Marín; Stephen Busby; Juan L Ramos; Silvia Marqués
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Functional architecture of Escherichia coli: new insights provided by a natural decomposition approach.

Authors:  Julio A Freyre-González; José A Alonso-Pavón; Luis G Treviño-Quintanilla; Julio Collado-Vides
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.