J C Badcock1, P T Michie, L Johnson, J Combrinck. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Western Australia/Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Graylands Hospital, Claremont, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inhibitory deficits have been frequently reported in schizophrenia. Such deficits are usually associated with activities of prefrontal cortex and related networks. An understanding of intentional inhibitory control requires knowledge of how actions are planned and initiated and the components involved in stopping these actions. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia, a psychosis comparison group and a healthy control group participated in a visual choice reaction time (go) task and attempted to inhibit their responses to the go task when an auditory 'stop' signal was heard. RESULTS: Schizophrenia patients demonstrated significantly slower response execution but the estimated speed of inhibition was not significantly different from that of healthy controls. Both patient groups were impaired in their ability to inhibit a response across a range of stop-signal delays. The poorer performance of schizophrenia patients only was related to a difficulty in reliably triggering the inhibitory response. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired response inhibition is not unique to schizophrenia. However, the nature of their problem is markedly different from that of other psychopathological groups. Possible neural mechanisms underpinning difficulties in triggering inhibitory responses and in the voluntary initiation of actions in schizophrenia are considered.
BACKGROUND: Inhibitory deficits have been frequently reported in schizophrenia. Such deficits are usually associated with activities of prefrontal cortex and related networks. An understanding of intentional inhibitory control requires knowledge of how actions are planned and initiated and the components involved in stopping these actions. METHODS:Patients with schizophrenia, a psychosis comparison group and a healthy control group participated in a visual choice reaction time (go) task and attempted to inhibit their responses to the go task when an auditory 'stop' signal was heard. RESULTS:Schizophreniapatients demonstrated significantly slower response execution but the estimated speed of inhibition was not significantly different from that of healthy controls. Both patient groups were impaired in their ability to inhibit a response across a range of stop-signal delays. The poorer performance of schizophreniapatients only was related to a difficulty in reliably triggering the inhibitory response. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired response inhibition is not unique to schizophrenia. However, the nature of their problem is markedly different from that of other psychopathological groups. Possible neural mechanisms underpinning difficulties in triggering inhibitory responses and in the voluntary initiation of actions in schizophrenia are considered.
Authors: Katharine N Thakkar; Jeffrey D Schall; Leanne Boucher; Gordon D Logan; Sohee Park Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-23 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Deanna M Barch; Todd S Braver; Cameron S Carter; Russell A Poldrack; Trevor W Robbins Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Lorenza Serena Colzato; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Nelleke C van Wouwe; Merel M Pannebakker; Bernhard Hommel Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2009-05-31 Impact factor: 1.972