Literature DB >> 11866269

Yield of colonoscopy in patients with nonacute rectal bleeding: a multicenter database study of 1766 patients.

H E Mulcahy1, R S Patel, G Postic, M A Eloubeidi, J A Vaughan, M Wallace, A Barkun, P S Jowell, J Leung, E Libby, N Nickl, S Schutz, P B Cotton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There are few data to guide the choice between colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy in patients with nonacute rectal bleeding, especially in younger age groups. Our aim was to determine the yield of colonoscopy for significant proximal large bowel disease in the absence of significant distal disease, with special reference to young patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of data collected prospectively in 1766 patients (median age 57 yr, 711 women). The endoscopic database (GI-Trac) contained 152 discrete fields for data input. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables independently associated with the presence of isolated significant proximal disease.
RESULTS: Young patients had a higher percentage of normal examinations than did older patients. The incidence of diverticular disease, small polyps, large polyps, and cancer rose with increasing age. No patient aged <40 yr had an isolated proximal cancer, but 7% had other significant isolated proximal disease. There was no overall association between age and significant proximal disease in the absence of significant distal disease (p = 0.66). The only variable associated with isolated proximal disease was anemia (odds ratio = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.11-2.93; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: The yield of colonoscopy (beyond the range of sigmoidoscopy) for neoplasia is low in patients aged <40 yr, but other significant disease may be missed if age is the only criterion determining colonoscopy use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11866269     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05465.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  6 in total

1.  Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care.

Authors:  William G Paterson; William T Depew; Pierre Paré; Denis Petrunia; Connie Switzer; Sander J Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Sandra Daniels
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Colonoscopic evaluation of hematochezia in low and average risk patients for colorectal cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Puglisi Carlo; Russo-Francesco Paolo; Barbera Carmelo; Incarbone Salvatore; Aprile Giuseppe; Bonanno Giacomo; Russo Antonio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Achieving the best bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Alex Ruiz; Manuel Alvarez-Lobos; Ana Amorós; Juan Cristóbal Gana; Patricio Ibáñez; Akiko Ono; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Screening polypectomy rates below quality benchmarks: a prospective study.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Mengzhu Jiang; Mélanie Fon Sing; Alan Barkun; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Age and manifestation related symptoms in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Roland S Croner; Wolfgang M Brueckl; Bertram Reingruber; Werner Hohenberger; Klaus Guenther
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Whole-colon investigation vs. flexible sigmoidoscopy for suspected colorectal cancer based on presenting symptoms and signs: a multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Kate Wooldrage; Emma C Robbins; Kevin Pack; Jeremy P Brown; William Hamilton; Michael R Thompson; Karen G Flashman; Steve Halligan; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Margaret Vance; Brian P Saunders; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.