Literature DB >> 11865766

Genetically modified feeds in animal nutrition. 1st communication: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn in poultry, pig and ruminant nutrition.

K Aulrich1, H Böhme, R Daenicke, I Halle, G Flachowsky.   

Abstract

During the last few years, animal nutrition has been confronted with genetically modified organisms (GMO), and their significance will increase in the future. The study presents investigations on the substantial equivalence of the transgenic Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) corn and the corresponding nontransgenic hybrid Cesar and parameters of nutrition physiology such as digestibility and energy content for poultry, pigs and ruminants. The results of the analysed corn samples as well as of the silage samples illustrated substantial equivalence in all investigated ingredients, such as crude nutrients, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals and non-starch polysaccharides. The results of the experiments using poultry, pigs, wethers and fattening bulls were not influenced by the genetic modification of corn. The determined values for the digestibilities and the energy contents for poultry, pigs and wethers were not affected by the used corn variety. Neither the examined parameters of the fattening experiments with bulls nor the slaughter results showed any significant differences between the bulls fed on silages made from the nontransgenic or transgenic corn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11865766     DOI: 10.1080/17450390109381977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Tierernahr        ISSN: 0003-942X


  6 in total

1.  A review on comparative data concerning Fusarium mycotoxins in Bt maize and non-Bt isogenic maize.

Authors:  Vladimir Ostry; Jaroslava Ovesna; Jarmila Skarkova; Vladimira Pouchova; Jiri Ruprich
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  Assessment of genetically modified soybean in relation to natural variation in the soybean seed metabolome.

Authors:  Joseph D Clarke; Danny C Alexander; Dennis P Ward; John A Ryals; Matthew W Mitchell; Jacob E Wulff; Lining Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effect of dietary phytase transgenic corn on physiological characteristics and the fate of recombinant plant DNA in laying hens.

Authors:  Chunqi Gao; Qiugang Ma; Lihong Zhao; Jianyun Zhang; Cheng Ji
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 4.  Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Feed: Is There Any Difference From Food?

Authors:  Paula A Giraldo; Hiroshi Shinozuka; German C Spangenberg; Noel O I Cogan; Kevin F Smith
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew Bartholomaeus; Wayne Parrott; Genevieve Bondy; Kate Walker
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  GMOs in animal agriculture: time to consider both costs and benefits in regulatory evaluations.

Authors:  Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.