Literature DB >> 11865342

Ultrasonically activated shears in extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis1, Mochammed Jabarin, John C Tsimoyiannis, John P Betzios, Christos Tsilikatis, George Glantzounis.   

Abstract

Gastrectomy, followed by extended lymphadenectomy, is the treatment of choice in some stages of advanced gastric cancer. Lymphorrhea, as a result of the many divided lymphatic vessels, increases the morbidity. Ultrasonically activated coagulated shears (UACS) may divide all small vessels followed by immediate sealing of the coapted vessel walls. We designed a prospective randomized study to determine the effectiveness of the UACS versus monopolar electrosurgery in D2 dissection. Forty patients with gastric cancer stage II or stage IIIA were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups of 20 patients each. Group A underwent lymphatic dissection with monopolar cautery. Group B underwent lymphatic dissection with UACS. Subhepatic and left sudiaphragmatic closed drains were left until lymphorrhea and/or oozing stopped. Total gastrectomy was performed in 16 patients of group A and 14 of group B; subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 4 patients in group A and 6 patients in group B. The drains were removed after 6-17 days (mean 9.7 +/- 2.9) in group Aand after 4-8 days (mean 5.6 +/- 1.2) in group B(p < 0.001). The total amount of drained fluid was 300-2050 ml (mean 985 +/- 602) in group A and 230-1080 ml (mean 480 +/- 242) in group B (p < 0.002). Eight patients in group A and 5 in group B had postoperative fever, while 3 and 1 patients, respectively, had wound infections. In conclusion the use of UACS is a safe method of lymphatic dissection which reduces operative blood loss, postoperative lymphorrhea, blood transfusions,and hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11865342     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0199-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  12 in total

1.  Risk factors for surgical site infections after elective gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Masahiro Ito; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Experimental evaluation of bursting pressure in lymphatic vessels with ultrasonically activated shears.

Authors:  Kaoru Abe; Masanori Terashima; Hisataka Fujiwara; Akinori Takagane; Noriyuki Uesugi; Kazuyoshi Saito
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  New-model ultrasonically activated shears for hemostatic sectioning during video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Shunsuke Yamada; Kazuho Yoshino; Hiroshi Inoue
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-12-11

4.  Ultrasonically activated shears in gastrectomy for large gastric cancers.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Mohri; Hitoshi Tonouchi; Koji Tanaka; Masaki Ohi; Yuuki Koike; Yuuki Morimoto; Chikao Miki; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Risk factors associated with increased drainage volumes of chest tubes after transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Kato; Tomoki Makino; Makoto Yamasaki; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Masaaki Motoori; Yutaka Kimura; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  A randomized phase II study of the clinical effects of ultrasonically activated coagulating shears (Harmonic scalpel) in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ryohei Kawabata; Shuji Takiguchi; Yutaka Kimura; Hiroshi Imamura; Junya Fujita; Shigeyuki Tamura; Kazumasa Fujitani; Kentaro Kishi; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Shinichi Fujiwara; Yukinori Kurokawa; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Ultrasonically activated shears versus electrocautery in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Min-Gew Choi; Seung Jong Oh; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Sung Kim; Jae Moon Bae
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Ultrasonic scalpel for gastric cancer surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Kentaro Inoue; Yasushi Nakane; Taku Michiura; Masanori Yamada; Hiromi Mukaide; Junichi Fukui; Hirokazu Miki; Yosuke Ueyama; Richi Nakatake; Katsuji Tokuhara; Shigeyoshi Iwamoto; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Hideyoshi Toyokawa; Sohei Satoi; A-Hon Kwon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Treatment and prevention of lymphorrhea after radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Lin Sheng-Zhang; Tong Hong-Fei; Ni Zhong-Lin; Yu Yao-Jun; You Tao; Zhang Wei
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Gastrectomy and D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Techniques.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Chia-Wen Hsiao; Jeffrey W Clymer; Michael L Schwiers; Bryanna N Tibensky; Leena Patel; Nicole C Ferko; Edward Chekan
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.