AIM: To determine the diagnostic efficiency of assays routinely used in the investigation of hereditary angio-oedema. METHODS: Over a four year period, 1144 samples were received for analysis from 907 patients suspected of C1 inhibitor deficiency. Analyses were performed for C4 and C1 inhibitor (functional and immunochemical). Notes were reviewed retrospectively on patients with low serological indicators to determine diagnosis. RESULTS: These are the first data to indicate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the assays most frequently used to screen for C1 inhibitor deficiency. A combination of low C4 and low C1 inhibitor function has 98% specificity for C1 inhibitor deficiency in this population and a 96% negative predictive value, and is thus a very effective screen. All patients with untreated C1 inhibitor deficiency had a low C4 value. CONCLUSIONS: All patients considered for a diagnosis of C1 inhibitor deficiency should have serum examined to measure both C4 and functional C1 inhibitor. If either is normal at presentation this essentially excludes a diagnosis of C1 inhibitor deficiency. These tests can be performed sequentially. If C4 is normal it is not necessary to proceed to C1 inhibitor analysis. If C1 inhibitor function and C4 are both low then a repeat sample should be obtained to confirm the findings.
AIM: To determine the diagnostic efficiency of assays routinely used in the investigation of hereditary angio-oedema. METHODS: Over a four year period, 1144 samples were received for analysis from 907 patients suspected of C1 inhibitor deficiency. Analyses were performed for C4 and C1 inhibitor (functional and immunochemical). Notes were reviewed retrospectively on patients with low serological indicators to determine diagnosis. RESULTS: These are the first data to indicate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the assays most frequently used to screen for C1 inhibitor deficiency. A combination of low C4 and low C1 inhibitor function has 98% specificity for C1 inhibitor deficiency in this population and a 96% negative predictive value, and is thus a very effective screen. All patients with untreated C1 inhibitor deficiency had a low C4 value. CONCLUSIONS: All patients considered for a diagnosis of C1 inhibitor deficiency should have serum examined to measure both C4 and functional C1 inhibitor. If either is normal at presentation this essentially excludes a diagnosis of C1 inhibitor deficiency. These tests can be performed sequentially. If C4 is normal it is not necessary to proceed to C1 inhibitor analysis. If C1 inhibitor function and C4 are both low then a repeat sample should be obtained to confirm the findings.
Authors: Angelo Agostoni; Emel Aygören-Pürsün; Karen E Binkley; Alvaro Blanch; Konrad Bork; Laurence Bouillet; Christoph Bucher; Anthony J Castaldo; Marco Cicardi; Alvin E Davis; Caterina De Carolis; Christian Drouet; Christiane Duponchel; Henriette Farkas; Kálmán Fáy; Béla Fekete; Bettina Fischer; Luigi Fontana; George Füst; Roberto Giacomelli; Albrecht Gröner; C Erik Hack; George Harmat; John Jakenfelds; Mathias Juers; Lajos Kalmár; Pál N Kaposi; István Karádi; Arianna Kitzinger; Tímea Kollár; Wolfhart Kreuz; Peter Lakatos; Hilary J Longhurst; Margarita Lopez-Trascasa; Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer; Nicole Monnier; István Nagy; Eva Németh; Erik Waage Nielsen; Jan H Nuijens; Caroline O'grady; Emanuela Pappalardo; Vincenzo Penna; Carlo Perricone; Roberto Perricone; Ursula Rauch; Olga Roche; Eva Rusicke; Peter J Späth; George Szendei; Edit Takács; Attila Tordai; Lennart Truedsson; Lilian Varga; Beáta Visy; Kayla Williams; Andrea Zanichelli; Lorenza Zingale Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Didier G Ebo; Marjoke M Verweij; Kathleen J De Knop; Margo M Hagendorens; Chris H Bridts; Luc S De Clerck; Wim J Stevens Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: M M Gompels; R J Lock; M Abinun; C A Bethune; G Davies; C Grattan; A C Fay; H J Longhurst; L Morrison; A Price; M Price; D Watters Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.330