| Literature DB >> 11864980 |
Yuko Kaneda1, Robert F Whittier, Hidenori Yamanaka, Enrique Carredano, Masanori Gotoh, Hiroyuki Sota, Yukio Hasegawa, Yasuro Shinohara.
Abstract
Despite very similar tertiary structures based upon a common framework, legume lectins exhibit an amazing variety of sugar binding specificities. While most of these lectins recognize rather discrete sugar linkages, Phaseolus vulgaris erythroagglutinating and leukoagglutinating lectins (E(4)- and L(4)-PHA) are unique in recognizing larger structures. E(4)- and L(4)-PHA are known to recognize complex type N-glycans containing bisecting GlcNAc or a beta1,6-linked branch, respectively. However, the detailed mechanisms of molecular recognition are poorly understood. In order to dissect the contributions of different portions of each lectin, we carried out region-swapping mutagenesis between E(4)- and L(4)-PHA. We prepared six chimeric lectins by exchanging different combinations of loop B and the central portion of loop C, two of four loops thought to be important for the recognition of monosaccharides (Sharma, V., and Surolia, A. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 267, 433-445). The chimeric lectins' sugar binding activities were evaluated quantitatively by surface plasmon resonance. These comparisons indicate that the high specificities of E(4)- and L(4)-PHA toward bisecting GlcNAc and beta1,6-linked branch structures are almost solely attributable to loop B. The contribution of the central portion of loop C to the recognition of those structural motifs was found to be negligible. Instead, it modulates affinity toward LacNAc residues present at the nonreducing terminus. Moreover, some of the chimeric lectins prepared in this study showed even higher specificities/affinities than native E(4)- and L(4)-PHA toward complex sugar chains containing either a bisecting GlcNAc residue or a beta1,6-linked branch.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11864980 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112382200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Chem ISSN: 0021-9258 Impact factor: 5.157