BACKGROUND: Besides the three known genes (RHO, RDS/Peripherin, NRL) involved in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), a fourth gene, RP1, has been recently identified. Initial reports suggest that mutations in the RP1 gene are the second most frequent cause of adRP. The clinical findings were described in a family with adRP and a novel mutation in the RP1 gene. METHOD: Index patients from 15 independent families with adRP in which RHO mutations had been excluded in previous examinations were screened for mutations in the RP1 gene by means of direct DNA sequencing. Evaluation of the RP1 phenotype in patients included funduscopy, kinetic perimetry, dark adapted final threshold test, standard electroretinography and, in one case, multifocal electroretinography. RESULTS: One novel nonsense mutation (Lys778ter) in one of these 15 patients was detected. Cosegregation of the mutation with the disease phenotype could be established in the index patient's family. The phenotype comprises variable expression of clinical disease probably including one case of incomplete penetrance, a onset of symptoms beginning in adulthood, and evidence of regionally varying retinal function loss. CONCLUSION: The Lys778ter mutation localises inside the critical region harbouring all mutations described so far. The ophthalmic findings support previous observations that variation of disease expression appears as a typical feature of the RP1 phenotype.
BACKGROUND: Besides the three known genes (RHO, RDS/Peripherin, NRL) involved in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), a fourth gene, RP1, has been recently identified. Initial reports suggest that mutations in the RP1 gene are the second most frequent cause of adRP. The clinical findings were described in a family with adRP and a novel mutation in the RP1 gene. METHOD: Index patients from 15 independent families with adRP in which RHO mutations had been excluded in previous examinations were screened for mutations in the RP1 gene by means of direct DNA sequencing. Evaluation of the RP1 phenotype in patients included funduscopy, kinetic perimetry, dark adapted final threshold test, standard electroretinography and, in one case, multifocal electroretinography. RESULTS: One novel nonsense mutation (Lys778ter) in one of these 15 patients was detected. Cosegregation of the mutation with the disease phenotype could be established in the index patient's family. The phenotype comprises variable expression of clinical disease probably including one case of incomplete penetrance, a onset of symptoms beginning in adulthood, and evidence of regionally varying retinal function loss. CONCLUSION: The Lys778ter mutation localises inside the critical region harbouring all mutations described so far. The ophthalmic findings support previous observations that variation of disease expression appears as a typical feature of the RP1 phenotype.
Authors: G J Farrar; P Kenna; S A Jordan; R Kumar-Singh; M M Humphries; E M Sharp; D M Sheils; P Humphries Journal: Nature Date: 1991-12-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: L L Field; J R Heckenlively; R S Sparkes; C A Garcia; C Farson; D Zedalis; M C Sparkes; M Crist; S Tideman; M A Spence Journal: J Med Genet Date: 1982-08 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: T P Dryja; T L McGee; E Reichel; L B Hahn; G S Cowley; D W Yandell; M A Sandberg; E L Berson Journal: Nature Date: 1990-01-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: S H Blanton; J R Heckenlively; A W Cottingham; J Friedman; L A Sadler; M Wagner; L H Friedman; S P Daiger Journal: Genomics Date: 1991-12 Impact factor: 5.736
Authors: Stephen P Daiger; Lori S Sullivan; Sara J Bowne; Avril Kennan; Peter Humphries; David G Birch; John R Heckenlively Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Firoz Kabir; Inayat Ullah; Shahbaz Ali; Alexander D H Gottsch; Muhammad Asif Naeem; Muhammad Zaman Assir; Shaheen N Khan; Javed Akram; Sheikh Riazuddin; Radha Ayyagari; J Fielding Hejtmancik; S Amer Riazuddin Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Amit Tiwari; Angela Bahr; Luzy Bähr; Johannes Fleischhauer; Martin S Zinkernagel; Niklas Winkler; Daniel Barthelmes; Lieselotte Berger; Christina Gerth-Kahlert; John Neidhardt; Wolfgang Berger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Amit Tiwari; Johannes Lemke; Janine Altmueller; Holger Thiele; Esther Glaus; Johannes Fleischhauer; Peter Nürnberg; John Neidhardt; Wolfgang Berger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna M Siemiatkowska; Galuh D N Astuti; Kentar Arimadyo; Anneke I den Hollander; Sultana M H Faradz; Frans P M Cremers; Rob W J Collin Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Qin Liu; Rob W J Collin; Frans P M Cremers; Anneke I den Hollander; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Eric A Pierce Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kaylie D Jones; Dianna K Wheaton; Sara J Bowne; Lori S Sullivan; David G Birch; Rui Chen; Stephen P Daiger Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 2.367