Literature DB >> 11864665

Has the use of routine episiotomy decreased? Examination of episiotomy rates from 1983 to 2000.

Jay Goldberg1, David Holtz, Terry Hyslop, Jorge E Tolosa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if practice patterns have been altered by the large body of literature strongly advocating the selective use of episiotomy.
METHODS: An electronic audit of the medical procedures database at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital from 1983 to 2000 was completed. Univariate and multivariable models were computed using logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Overall episiotomy rates in 34,048 vaginal births showed a significant reduction from 69.6% in 1983 to 19.4% in 2000. Significantly decreased risk of episiotomy was seen based upon year of childbirth (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86, 0.87), black race (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.28, 0.31), and spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.36, 0.45). Increased association with episiotomy was seen in forceps deliveries (OR 4.04, 95% CI 3.46, 4.72), and with third- or fourth-degree lacerations (OR 4.87, 95% CI 4.38, 5.41). In deliveries with known insurance status, having Medicaid insurance was also associated with a decreased episiotomy risk (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54, 0.64).
CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant reduction in the overall episiotomy rate between 1983 and 2000. White women consistently underwent episiotomy more frequently than black women even when controlling for age, parity, insurance status, and operative vaginal delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11864665     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01756-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Anal sphincter lacerations and upright delivery postures--a risk analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Inga Ragnar; Asa Ekström; Tanja Tydén; Sven-Eric Olsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-04-25

2.  Demographic variations and clinical associations of episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Dotun Ogunyemi; Brandy Manigat; Jesse Marquis; Mohsen Bazargan
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Trends in major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma, 1996-2006.

Authors:  Bela Kudish; Robert J Sokol; Michael Kruger
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal births in Shanghai hospitals, China: a comparison of policies.

Authors:  Shengyi Gu; Jindan Pei; Chenchen Zhou; Xiaobo Zhao; Sheng Wan; Jun Zhang; Adewumi Adanlawo; Zhongcheng Luo; Guizhu Wu; Xiaolin Hua
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Influence of training in the use and generation of evidence on episiotomy practice and perineal trauma.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Ho; Porjai Pattanittum; Robert P Japaraj; Tari Turner; Ussanee Swadpanich; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Retrospective analysis of episiotomy prevalence.

Authors:  Bahtışen Kartal; Aynur Kızılırmak; Pelin Calpbinici; Gökçe Demir
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2017-12-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.