Literature DB >> 11863204

Determining the optimal number of specimens to obtain with needle biopsy of the pleura.

D Jiménez1, E Pérez-Rodriguez, G Diaz, L Fogue, R W Light.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to define the number of pleural biopsy samples necessary for optimum diagnostic performance and determine to what extent they are complementary. Eighty-four closed pleural biopsies were performed in our department between June 1996 and January 1998 on 55 males and 29 females with an average age of 64.4 +/- 16.7 years. The study of the pleural fluid included: pH, biochemical testing of pleura/serum (proteins, lactate dehydrogenase, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, albumin and adenosine deaminase), haemogram, cytology and microbiological testing (Gram-staining, aerobes, anaerobes and mycobacteriae cultures). The biopsies were performed using a Cope needle, with a total of five biopsies for each patient: four for pathological examination (taken numerically in the order in which they were performed: D1, D2, D3 and D4) and one for microbiological testing. In those cases in which the diagnosis was uncertain or effusion persisted, a thoracoscopy or thoracotomy was performed. There were no significant differences in the diagnostic yield of each individual sample (D1, D2, D3 and D4), but there were differences in the sum of the samples, depending on the number of biopsies performed.This was true for total group and the group with carcinomas, but not for the group with tuberculosis. The increase in diagnostic yield with the number of biopsies was more remarkable in the carcinoma cases, where it increased by 35% when four biopsies were performed (54% with one biopsy versus 89% with four biopsies, P < 0.002). In conclusion, the diagnostic yield increased with the number of biopsy samples in the total group and the group with malignancy but not in the group with tuberculous effusions. The best diagnostic performance for malignant pathology was obtained with four samples. In pleural tuberculosis, the diagnostic yield did not increase with more biopsy samples. One high quality sample should be enough to obtain a diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11863204     DOI: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  4 in total

1.  Role of blind closed pleural biopsy in the managment of pleural exudates.

Authors:  Marco F Pereyra; Esther San-José; Lucía Ferreiro; Antonio Golpe; José Antúnez; Francisco-Javier González-Barcala; Ihab Abdulkader; José M Álvarez-Dobaño; Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez; Luis Valdés
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 2.  Medical thoracoscopy and its evolving role in the diagnosis and treatment of pleural disease.

Authors:  Vivek Murthy; Jamie L Bessich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Combined ultrasound-guided cutting-needle biopsy and standard pleural biopsy for diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.

Authors:  Jinlin Wang; Xinghua Zhou; Xiaohong Xie; Qing Tang; Panxiao Shen; Yunxiang Zeng
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.317

4.  Diagnostic Yield of Medical Thoracoscopy in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion.

Authors:  Arda Kiani; Atefeh Abedini; Mahmoud Karimi; Katayoun Samadi; Kambiz Sheikhy; Behrooz Farzanegan; Mihan Pour Abdollah; Hamidreza Jamaati; Hamid Reza Jabardarjani; Mohammad Reza Masjedi
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2015
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.