Literature DB >> 11863161

On the influence of laryngeal pathologies on acoustic and electroglottographic jitter measures.

Maurílio N Vieira1, Fergus R McInnes, Mervyn A Jack.   

Abstract

This study compared acoustic and electroglottographic (EGG) jitter from [a] vowels of 103 dysphonic speakers. The EGG recordings were chosen according to their intensity, signal-to-noise ratio, and percentage of unvoiced intervals, while acoustic signals were selected based on voicing detection and the reliability of jitter extraction. The agreement between jitter measures was expressed numerically as a normalized difference. In 63.1% (65/103) of the cases the differences fell within +/-22.5%. Positive differences above +22.5% were associated with increased acoustic jitter and occurred in 12.6% (13/103) of the speakers. These were, typically, cases of small nodular lesions without problems in the posterior larynx. On the other hand, substantial rises in EGG jitter leading to differences below -22.5% took place in 24.3% (25/103) of the speakers and were related to hyperfunctional voices, creaky-like voices, small laryngeal asymmetries affecting the arytenoids, or small-to-moderate glottal chinks. A clinically relevant outcome of the study was the possibility of detecting gentle laryngeal asymmetries among cases of large unilateral increase in EGG jitter. These asymmetries can be linked with vocal problems that are often overlooked in endoscopic examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11863161     DOI: 10.1121/1.1430686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Objective methods of sample selection in acoustic analysis of voice.

Authors:  Aleksandra E Olszewski; Lisa Shen; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Updating signal typing in voice: addition of type 4 signals.

Authors:  Alicia Sprecher; Aleksandra Olszewski; Jack J Jiang; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic characteristics of phonation in "wet voice" conditions.

Authors:  Shanmugam Murugappan; Suzanne Boyce; Sid Khosla; Lisa Kelchner; Ephraim Gutmark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Quantitative, clinically relevant acoustic measurements of focal embouchure dystonia.

Authors:  Aimee E Morris; Scott A Norris; Joel S Perlmutter; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 10.338

5.  Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Katrin Werth; Daniel Voigt; Michael Döllinger; Ulrich Eysholdt; Jörg Lohscheller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Towards a Singing Voice Multi-Sensor Analysis Tool: System Design, and Assessment Based on Vocal Breathiness.

Authors:  Evangelos Angelakis; Natalia Kotsani; Anastasia Georgaki
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Persistent dysphonia after laryngomicrosurgery for benign vocal fold disease.

Authors:  Yoo Seob Shin; Jae Won Chang; Suk Min Yang; Hee Won Wu; Min Hyuk Cho; Chul-Ho Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Vocalizations of adult male Asian koels (Eudynamys scolopacea) in the breeding season.

Authors:  Abdul Aziz Khan; Irfan Zia Qureshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.