Literature DB >> 1186273

Esophagogastrostomy. Analysis of 55 cases.

A D Boyd, R Cukingnan, R M Engelman, S A Localio, L Slattery, D A Tice, J A Bardin, F C Spencer.   

Abstract

At the New York University Medical Center from January, 1969, through December, 1973, esophagogastrostomies were performed in 56 patients. In 30 (Group A), fundoplications were combined with the esophagogastrostomies; in the other 26 (Group B), esophagogastrostomies only were performed. These two groups have been compared in an effort to determine the effectiveness of fundoplication in preventing gastric reflux following esophagogastrostomy. The operative mortality rate (10 per cent) and the 3 year survival rate (20 per cent) were approximately equal in the two groups. Clinical evidence of reflux was noted in 10 per cent of Group A and 47 per cent of Group B patients, while complications of reflux were noted in 5 per cent of Group A and in 33 per cent of Group B patients. The results of the present study suggest that fundoplication, while not prolonging survival, does prevent the symptoms and complications of gastric reflux and improves the quality of survival in these unfortunate patients. This leads us to recommend the routine use of fundoplication with esophagogastrostomy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1186273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  [Comparative studies of various suture techniques in transthoracic esophagogastric anastomoses in dogs (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Scheele; P Klüpfel; H J Pesch; B Husemann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1978-04-07

2.  An antireflux anastomosis following esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmad Aly; Glyn G Jamieson; David I Watson; Peter G Devitt; Roger Ackroyd; Chris J Stoddard
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Intraoperative local adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  K Sugimachi; K Inokuchi; Y Okudaira; Y Natsuda; T Nakamura
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1982

4.  [Automatic suture devices: advantages and indications for gastrointestinal surgery].

Authors:  M Allgöwer; K Dinstl; E H Farthmann; H Hamelmann; A Thiede; G Heberer; K Kremer; B Ulrich; J R Siewert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1984

5.  Esophagogastrectomy: data favoring end-to-side anastomosis.

Authors:  J L Chassin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A manometric assessment of oesophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  D W Ward; H R Mathews
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Barrett's esophagus after resection of the gastroesophageal junction: effects of concomitant fundoplication.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Zane Hammoud; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Oesophageal flap valvuloplasty and wrapping suturing prevent gastrooesophageal reflux disease in dogs after oesophageal anastomosis.

Authors:  Ji-Gang Dai; Quan-Xing Liu; Xu-Feng Den; Jia-Xin Min
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Esophagogastrostomy with the EEA stapler.

Authors:  P N West; J P Marbarger; M N Martz; C L Roper
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.