Literature DB >> 11861730

Effects of alendronate on particle-induced osteolysis in a rat model.

Peter J Millett1, Matthew J Allen, Mathias P G Bostrom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Particle-induced osteolysis is currently a major problem affecting the long-term survivorship of total joint replacements. Alendronate is a third-generation bisphosphonate that blocks osteoclastic bone resorption. The objective of this study was to determine whether alendronate could prevent particle-induced osteolysis or restore (reverse) bone loss in established osteolysis.
METHODS: A rat model of particle-induced osteolysis was used. A specially designed polyethylene implant was placed in the proximal part of the right tibia of seventy-two animals. Following four weeks of healing, the animals were randomized into control groups, a prevention group, or a treatment group. In the prevention group, animals received intra-articular injections of high-density polyethylene particles (mean size, 2 m; all <10 m) at four, six, and eight weeks postoperatively. Alendronate (0.01 mg/kg/day) was administered concomitantly through an implantable pump from the fourth week through the tenth week. In the treatment group, animals were also exposed to polyethylene particles at four, six, and eight weeks, to establish bone loss, but they received alendronate subsequently, from the tenth week through the sixteenth week, to treat the bone loss. Positive (particle-only) and negative (saline-solution-only) control groups were assessed as well. Tissues were harvested at ten weeks in the prevention group and at sixteen weeks in the treatment group. Histological analyses and histomorphometric determinations of the periprosthetic bone volume were carried out.
RESULTS: Histological examination showed a rim of new bone (neocortex) around the implant in the untreated and saline-solution-treated control animals (no polyethylene particles). Treatment with saline solution (no polyethylene particles) did not affect periprosthetic bone. Animals exposed to polyethylene particles had bone loss. In those that received alendronate, the bone loss was either prevented or reversed, and the quantity of neocortical and trabecular bone was increased compared with that of the controls. Alendronate effectively preserved periprosthetic bone in both the prevention and treatment groups. In the prevention arm, the mean periprosthetic bone volume of the neocortex and the surrounding trabecular bone, as determined with histomorphometry, was 21.5% +/- 6.5% in the saline-solution-treated controls (no particles), 13.1% +/- 5.9% in the particle-treated animals, and 32.6% +/- 6.4% in the alendronate-treated animals (p < 0.001). In the treatment arm, the mean periprosthetic bone volume was 27.2% +/- 5.6% in the saline-solution-treated controls, 17.7% +/- 6.2% in the particle-treated animals, and 30.2% +/- 5.9% in the alendronate-treated animals (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In our model, the intra-articular injection of polyethylene particles caused substantial bone loss around a loaded implant. Alendronate effectively prevented and treated the particle-induced periprosthetic bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11861730     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  30 in total

1.  Periprosthetic bone density as outcome of therapeutic response.

Authors:  Giovanni Iolascon; Gioconda Di Pietro; Annarita Capaldo; Carmine Gioia; Salvatore Gatto; Francesca Gimigliano
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

2.  What experimental approaches (eg, in vivo, in vitro, tissue retrieval) are effective in investigating the biologic effects of particles?

Authors:  Mathias Bostrom; Regis O'Keefe
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Periprosthetic osteolysis after total hip replacement: molecular pathology and clinical management.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Susan D Neale; David R Haynes; Oksana T Holubowycz; Margaret A McGee; Lucian B Solomon; Stuart A Callary; Gerald J Atkins; David M Findlay
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.473

4.  [Supportive drugs for improved implant healing].

Authors:  R Skripitz; A Kurth; A Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Role of polyethylene particles in peri-prosthetic osteolysis: A review.

Authors:  Gerald J Atkins; David R Haynes; Donald W Howie; David M Findlay
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-10-18

6.  Similitude of cement-bone micromechanics in cemented rat and human knee replacement.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Megan E Tatusko; Megan E Oest
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Pentamidine Inhibits Titanium Particle-Induced Osteolysis In Vivo and Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB Ligand-Mediated Osteoclast Differentiation In Vitro.

Authors:  Hye Jung Ihn; Kiryeong Kim; Hye-Sung Cho; Eui Kyun Park
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.169

8.  An in vivo murine model of continuous intramedullary infusion of polyethylene particles.

Authors:  Ting Ma; Zhinong Huang; Pei-Gen Ren; Ryan McCally; Derek Lindsey; R L Smith; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Enhancement of periprosthetic bone quality with topical hydroxyapatite-bisphosphonate composite.

Authors:  Sanjeev J Suratwala; Samuel K Cho; Jonathan J van Raalte; Sang Hyun Park; Sung Wook Seo; Seong-Sil Chang; Thomas R Gardner; Francis Young-In Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Femoral osteolysis following total hip replacement.

Authors:  R Dattani
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.