Literature DB >> 11861632

Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility.

Matthew I Kim1, Kevin B Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Web-based applications have been developed that allow patients to enter their own information into secure personal health records. These applications are being promoted as a means of providing patients and providers with universal access to updated medical information. The authors evaluated the functionality and utility of a selection of personal health records.
DESIGN: A targeted search strategy was used to identify eleven Web sites promoting different personal health records. Specific criteria related to the entry and display of data elements were developed to evaluate the functionality of each PHR. Information abstracted from an actual case was used to create a series of representative PHRs. Output generated for review was evaluated to assess the accuracy and completeness of clinical information related to the diagnosis and treatment of specific disorders.
RESULTS: The PHRs selected for review employed data entry methods that limited the range and content of patient-entered information related to medical history, medications, laboratory tests, diagnostic studies, and immunizations. Representative PHRs created with information abstracted from an actual case displayed varying amounts of information at basic and comprehensive levels of representation.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available PHRs demonstrate limited functionality. The data entry, validation, and information display methods they employ may limit their utility as representations of medical information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11861632      PMCID: PMC344574          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m0978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  15 in total

1.  msJAMA. Patient participation in electronic medical records.

Authors:  C C Tsai; J Starren
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  msJAMA. The patient-owned, population-based electronic medical record: a revolutionary resource for clinical medicine.

Authors:  J Rashbass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Online consumer health records: revolution or confusion?

Authors:  M Hagland
Journal:  J AHIMA       Date:  2000-03

4.  Get it in writing. Your medical record is like a credit rating. Don't neglect it.

Authors:  E Spragins
Journal:  Newsweek       Date:  1998-08-24

5.  A trial of parent held child health records in the armed forces.

Authors:  S A Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-21

6.  Patient participation in the problem-oriented system: a health care plan.

Authors:  C G Hertz; J W Bernheim; T N Perloff
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients.

Authors:  R Jones; J Pearson; S McGregor; A J Cawsey; A Barrett; N Craig; J M Atkinson; W H Gilmour; J McEwen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

8.  Online personal medical records: are they reliable for acute/critical care?

Authors:  J H Schneider
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  An evaluation of patient access to their electronic medical records via the World Wide Web.

Authors:  J J Cimino; J Li; E A Mendonça; S Sengupta; V L Patel; A W Kushniruk
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

10.  Can patients keep their own peak-flow records reliably?

Authors:  M R Hetzel; I P Williams; R M Shakespeare
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-03-17       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  47 in total

1.  Implementing security and access control mechanisms for an electronic healthcare record.

Authors:  Frank K Ueckert; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Triaging patients at risk of influenza using a patient portal.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Titus L Daniels; Thomas R Talbot; Taylor McClain; Robert Hennes; Shane Stenner; Sue Muse; Jim Jirjis; Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Designing patient-centered personal health records (PHRs): health care professionals' perspective on patient-generated data.

Authors:  Nicholas Huba; Yan Zhang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Sociotechnical Challenges of Developing an Interoperable Personal Health Record: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Gregory L Gaskin; Christopher A Longhurst; Rebecca Slayton; Amar K Das
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  The PING personally controlled electronic medical record system: technical architecture.

Authors:  William W Simons; Kenneth D Mandl; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Parents as partners in obtaining the medication history.

Authors:  Stephen C Porter; Isaac S Kohane; Donald A Goldmann
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Informatics challenges for the impending patient information explosion.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Jacqueline Moss
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Personal health record systems and their security protection.

Authors:  Khin Than Win; Willy Susilo; Yi Mu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  A patient-centric taxonomy for personal health records (PHRs).

Authors:  Adam Vincent; David C Kaelber; David Charles Kaelber; Eric Pan; Sapna Shah; Sapna S Shah; Douglas Johnston; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

10.  A novel system architecture for the national integration of electronic health records: a semi-centralized approach.

Authors:  Asma AlJarullah; Samir El-Masri
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.