Literature DB >> 11860667

Assessment of patient satisfaction with psychiatric care. Development and clinical evaluation of a brief consumer satisfaction rating scale (UKU-ConSat).

U G Ahlfors1, T Lewander, E Lindström, U F Malt, H Lublin, U Malm.   

Abstract

Quality management and quality control of health services has become increasingly important. Central to the concept of quality of care is the patient's (the health care consumer's) own view of the care provided and the treatment outcome. UKU (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser; that is, Committee for Clinical Trials), a working group within the Scandinavian Society for Psychopharmacology (SSP), has designed a brief consumer satisfaction rating scale, the UKU-ConSat. Based on an extensive literature review, a number of principles related to content, assessment, interview techniques, documentation and standardisation steered the design of the rating scale. UKU-ConSat consists of six items related to the structure and process of treatment care, and two items related to outcome and well-being. A manual accompanies the rating scale with guidelines for how to solicit information from the patient and how to rate each item. A first field trial of the rating scale in 135 inpatients at multiple clinical sites in Finland and Sweden showed that it could be applied to several relevant patient categories (psychotic, affective, neurotic, organic and alcohol and substance abuse disorders). According to both patients and staff the rating scale promises to become useful both for research and for improvement of routine psychiatric services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11860667     DOI: 10.1080/080394801317084437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0803-9488            Impact factor:   2.202


  4 in total

1.  The development and evaluation of a five-language multi-perspective standardised measure: clinical decision-making involvement and satisfaction (CDIS).

Authors:  Mike Slade; Harriet Jordan; Eleanor Clarke; Paul Williams; Helena Kaliniecka; Katrin Arnold; Andrea Fiorillo; Domenico Giacco; Mario Luciano; Anikó Égerházi; Marietta Nagy; Malene Krogsgaard Bording; Helle Østermark Sørensen; Wulf Rössler; Wolfram Kawohl; Bernd Puschner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Helping the decision maker effectively promote various experts' views into various optimal solutions to China's institutional problem of health care provider selection through the organization of a pilot health care provider research system.

Authors:  Liyang Tang
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2013-04-04

Review 3.  Measuring the Patient Experience of Mental Health Care: A Systematic and Critical Review of Patient-Reported Experience Measures.

Authors:  Sara Fernandes; Guillaume Fond; Xavier Yves Zendjidjian; Karine Baumstarck; Christophe Lançon; Fabrice Berna; Franck Schurhoff; Bruno Aouizerate; Chantal Henry; Bruno Etain; Ludovic Samalin; Marion Leboyer; Pierre-Michel Llorca; Magali Coldefy; Pascal Auquier; Laurent Boyer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Striving for a more person-centered psychosis care: results of a hospital-based multi-professional educational intervention.

Authors:  Katarina Allerby; Anneli Goulding; Lilas Ali; Margda Waern
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.