Literature DB >> 11860541

Use of CA-125 and ultrasound in high-risk women.

Stéphane Laframboise1, R Nedelcu, J Murphy, D E C Cole, B Rosen.   

Abstract

Our objective was a retrospective study reporting on ovarian cancer screening in a high-risk female population using both CA-125 and ultrasound over a 7-year period. We used risk estimates of carrying a BRCA mutation that were based on family history. Subjects were screened with CA-125 and ultrasound every 6 months. Each of 311 high-risk subjects had between 1 and 17 screening visits. Overall, 33 of 1209 (2.7%) CA-125 results were abnormal (>35 U/ml); 226 of 1342 (17%) ultrasounds were abnormal, with abnormalities ranging from benign appearing cystic changes to more ominous patterns. Since entry into the program, 29 subjects (9%) have undergone surgery. In 20 of these, the preoperative screening was normal; in six, only the ultrasound was abnormal, and in two, only the CA-125 was abnormal (46-91 U/ml). In only one subject undergoing surgery were both serial CA-125 levels (52-91 U/ml) and ultrasound abnormal. In 7 years of screening, one patient (0.3%) has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer (stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma). Overall, 31 (10%) subjects have completed BRCA testing. We conclude that despite screening results comparable to other studies, the detection of only one ovarian cancer over 7 years is lower than expected. Explanations for this observation are discussed. Despite the limitations of CA-125 and ultrasound, we continue to recommend these screening modalities for high-risk women. At the present time, they offer the best opportunity to detect ovarian cancers early. With increasing knowledge of BRCA testing, more women may benefit from this testing in assessing their personal risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11860541     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01055.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

1.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing.

Authors:  Gabriel N Mannis; Julia E Fehniger; Jennifer S Creasman; Vanessa L Jacoby; Mary S Beattie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 2.  Hereditary ovarian carcinoma: heterogeneity, molecular genetics, pathology, and management.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Murray Joseph Casey; Carrie L Snyder; Chhanda Bewtra; Jane F Lynch; Matthew Butts; Andrew K Godwin
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Beyond CA125: the coming of age of ovarian cancer biomarkers. Are we there yet?

Authors:  Dimitra Sasaroli; George Coukos; Nathalie Scholler
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.851

4.  Screening for ovarian cancer in women with varying levels of risk, using annual tests, results in high recall for repeat screening tests.

Authors:  Marielle Ae Nobbenhuis; Elizabeth Bancroft; Eleanor Moskovic; Fiona Lennard; Paul Pharoah; Ian Jacobs; Ann Ward; Desmond Pj Barton; Thomas Ej Ind; John H Shepherd; Jane E Bridges; Martin Gore; Chris Haracopos; Susan Shanley; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Sarah Thomas; Ros Eeles
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.857

5.  No efficacy of annual gynaecological screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers; an observational follow-up study.

Authors:  B B J Hermsen; R I Olivier; R H M Verheijen; M van Beurden; J A de Hullu; L F Massuger; C W Burger; C T Brekelmans; M J Mourits; G H de Bock; K N Gaarenstroom; H H van Boven; T M Mooij; M A Rookus
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Clinical outcome of prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers and events during follow-up.

Authors:  R I Olivier; M van Beurden; M A C Lubsen; M A Rookus; T M Mooij; M J van de Vijver; L J van't Veer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary ovarian cancer is inefficient.

Authors:  A L Oei; L F Massuger; J Bulten; M J Ligtenberg; N Hoogerbrugge; J A de Hullu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.