Literature DB >> 11859429

Results of a multisite study of U.S. residential magnetic fields.

Richard F Rankin1, T Dan Bracken, Russell S Senior, Robert Kavet, Judith H Montgomery.   

Abstract

This paper describes the study design, measurement protocols, and results of a project examining residential magnetic-field exposures at eight sites across the contiguous United States. The goal of the project was to investigate surrogates that have been used in epidemiologic studies to characterize residential magnetic-field exposure. These surrogates include: personal-exposure (PE), fixed-location long-term (LT), and outside and inside point-in-time (PIT) magnetic-field measurements; net-service (or ground current) measurements; and the "wire-code category" of the residence. (The latter is a surrogate for magnetic-field exposure based on the nature and proximity of electric power lines outside the house.) Measurements were conducted on four visits to each of eight sites between January 1994 and June 1997 for a study population of 218 single-unit detached dwellings. Information on the residence, residents, and neighborhood was collected. A simple random sample of 392 single-unit detached dwellings at the sites was used to create a weighted sample of houses representative of the population of single-unit residences. The correlations among the various types of 60-Hz magnetic-field measures were relatively strong (Pearson r>0.74, Spearman rho>0.78). Variability of PE and LT measurements, as measured by the standard deviations during a visit, was independent of wire-code category. Visit means for PE, LT, and outside and inside PIT were well correlated over periods between visits of from 1.5 to 20 months (r>0.62, rho>0.76). These results support the use of survey measurements (less demanding than personal monitoring) to represent exposure that occurred up to 20 months in the past. The principal component of the total variance in PE measurements was the between-house variance; between-visit and between-site variances were generally less important. This supports the sampling of many houses with relatively few visits in residential exposure characterization studies. There was a trend for presumably higher wire-code categories to be associated with higher field summary measures for all summary measures related to magnetic-field magnitude, including PE and LT resultant, and inside and outside resultant (60 Hz) and harmonics. However, because of the overlap in field levels between categories, wire code was not a good predictor of magnetic-field levels, accounting for less than 21% of the variance in magnetic-field measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11859429     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  5 in total

1.  Impact of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on human postural control.

Authors:  Sebastien Villard; Alicia Allen; Nicolas Bouisset; Michael Corbacio; Alex Thomas; Michel Guerraz; Alexandre Legros
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Estimating magnetic fields of homes near transmission lines in the California Power Line Study.

Authors:  Ximena P Vergara; Robert Kavet; Catherine M Crespi; Chris Hooper; J Michael Silva; Leeka Kheifets
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Exposure to electrical contact currents and the risk of childhood leukemia.

Authors:  Monique Does; Ghislaine Scélo; Catherine Metayer; Steve Selvin; Robert Kavet; Patricia Buffler
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  PERSONAL MEASURES OF POWER-FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AMONG MEN FROM AN INFERTILITY CLINIC: DISTRIBUTION, TEMPORAL VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION WITH THEIR FEMALE PARTNERS' EXPOSURE.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; Patricia Morey; Jennifer B Ford; John D Meeker
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Temporal variability of daily personal magnetic field exposure metrics in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Kelly R Evenson; David A Savitz; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.563

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.