Literature DB >> 11859056

Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Guidelines highlight gaps in research evidence.

Jane Thomas, Shantini Paranjothy, Tony Kelly, Josephine Kavanagh.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 11859056      PMCID： PMC1122400     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Electronic fetal monitoring. Is not necessary for low risk labours.

Authors:  R Goddard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-16

Review 2.  Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.

Authors:  S B Thacker; D Stroup; M Chang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

3.  Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population.

Authors:  G Mires; F Williams; P Howie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-16

4.  When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough? How many patients you needed depends on what you found.

Authors:  A S Detsky; D L Sackett
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-04

5.  Clinical trials and rare diseases: a way out of a conundrum.

Authors:  R J Lilford; J G Thornton; D Braunholtz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-16

6.  Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study.

Authors:  M Waterstone; S Bewley; C Wolfe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

7.  Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labor.

Authors:  I Ingemarsson; S Arulkumaran; E Ingemarsson; R L Tambyraja; S S Ratnam
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.661
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.