Literature DB >> 11858577

Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants.

Gerald Krennmair1, Stefan Schmidinger, Othmar Waldenberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was intended to provide a report of experience and results with Frialit-2 implants used for single-tooth replacement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 7-year period (1994-2000), 146 single-tooth implants (84 maxilla, 62 mandible) were placed in 112 patients (67 females, 45 males; 31.2 +/- 16.4 years). The sites included maxillary anterior teeth (n = 38) as well as the mandibular premolars and molars (n = 57). Ninety-three crowns were cemented and 53 crowns were screw mounted (22 with vertical, 31 with horizontal screws) on standard abutments. The follow-up time varied between 3 and 80 months (35.8 +/- 16.5 months).
RESULTS: Two implants (1.4%) were lost, 1 during early loading and the other after 6 years. The most frequent prosthetic complication was isolated crown loosening of cemented crowns requiring recementation of 9 crowns (9.9%). Crowns with vertical screws showed no crown and/or screw loosening. Four crowns (2.8%) were replaced because of ceramic fracture. DISCUSSION: Peri-implant soft tissue condition, bone resorption, and Periotest values indicated satisfactory results. The cumulative implant survival rate during the follow-up period was 97.3%, and that of the crowns 96.4% (total cumulative survival rate 93.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: With the low number of abutment screw loosenings (3.5%), the deep internal hexagonal retention compared favorably to external retention methods. The predominant use of long implants (98.4% > or = 13 mm) allowed a favorable implant/crown ratio with the potential for problem-free, long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11858577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Stability of external and internal implant connections after a fatigue test.

Authors:  Paulo Cesar Pinheiro Feitosa; Ana Paula Barbosa de Lima; Laís Regiane Silva-Concílio; William Cunha Brandt; Ana Christina Claro Neves
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07

2.  Microstructured zirconia surfaces modulate osteogenic marker genes in human primary osteoblasts.

Authors:  Claudia Bergemann; Kathrin Duske; J Barbara Nebe; André Schöne; Ulrike Bulnheim; Hermann Seitz; Jens Fischer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  A resonance frequency analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched implants with different diameters: a prospective clinical study during the initial healing period.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Kim; Yeun-Kang Kim; Ji-Young Joo; Ju-Youn Lee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 4.  Retention failures in cement- and screw-retained fixed restorations on dental implants in partially edentulous arches: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jatin K Jain; Rajesh Sethuraman; Sameer Chauhan; Piyush Javiya; Shreya Srivastava; Rutvik Patel; Bhagyashri Bhalani
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation.

Authors:  R Rullo; A Piccirillo; F Femiano; L Nastri; V M Festa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Immediate Loading in Single-Implant Restoration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paolo Capparé; Francesco Ferrini; Corrado Ruscica; Giuseppe Pantaleo; Giulia Tetè; Enrico Felice Gherlone
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.