OBJECTIVE: To improve the identification of patients at risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 50 kidney or liver transplant patients who developed fever, 133 EDTA blood samples were analyzed, using two tests to measure CMV DNA: a 10-fold limiting dilution of an extract of 2 million leukocytes for CMV PCR, and a CMV hybrid capture assay. Both tests were compared with virus isolation, using an equivalent amount of leukocytes as a base for all three tests. RESULTS: The limiting-dilution CMV PCR and the hybrid capture assay presented relatively similar changes of sensitivity and specificity at different CMV DNA concentrations. The kinetics of the positive and negative predictive values were also comparable. A higher CMV DNA load corresponded to an increased risk of developing CMV disease. Furthermore, an increase in the endpoint dilution of a positive CMV PCR also corresponded to more severe disease. After antiviral treatment, the CMV PCR decreased by at least 100-fold (2 log10) in 10 cases and by 10-fold (1 log10) in five cases. Thus, there was a decrease in 15 of 18 (83%) patients. Similarly, with the hybrid capture assay, the amount of CMV DNA decreased about 100-fold in five patients and decreased by about 0.5 genome equivalents in five cases, i.e. in 10 of 12 (83%) patients. CONCLUSION: Both methods proved clinically useful for detecting patients at risk of developing CMV disease and for monitoring antiviral treatment in solid organ transplant patients.
OBJECTIVE: To improve the identification of patients at risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 50 kidney or liver transplant patients who developed fever, 133 EDTA blood samples were analyzed, using two tests to measure CMV DNA: a 10-fold limiting dilution of an extract of 2 million leukocytes for CMV PCR, and a CMV hybrid capture assay. Both tests were compared with virus isolation, using an equivalent amount of leukocytes as a base for all three tests. RESULTS: The limiting-dilution CMV PCR and the hybrid capture assay presented relatively similar changes of sensitivity and specificity at different CMV DNA concentrations. The kinetics of the positive and negative predictive values were also comparable. A higher CMV DNA load corresponded to an increased risk of developing CMV disease. Furthermore, an increase in the endpoint dilution of a positive CMV PCR also corresponded to more severe disease. After antiviral treatment, the CMV PCR decreased by at least 100-fold (2 log10) in 10 cases and by 10-fold (1 log10) in five cases. Thus, there was a decrease in 15 of 18 (83%) patients. Similarly, with the hybrid capture assay, the amount of CMV DNA decreased about 100-fold in five patients and decreased by about 0.5 genome equivalents in five cases, i.e. in 10 of 12 (83%) patients. CONCLUSION: Both methods proved clinically useful for detecting patients at risk of developing CMV disease and for monitoring antiviral treatment in solid organ transplant patients.
Authors: Roy F Chemaly; Belinda Yen-Lieberman; Elias A Castilla; Amy Reilly; Susana Arrigain; Carol Farver; Robin K Avery; Steven M Gordon; Gary W Procop Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.948