Literature DB >> 11856154

Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease.

Edgardo Rivera1, Frankie A Holmes, Aman U Buzdar, Lina Asmar, Shu-Wan Kau, Giuseppe Fraschini, Ronald Walters, Richard L Theriault, Gabriel N Hortobagyi.   

Abstract

We conducted a single-institution study to determine whether local therapy plus six cycles of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) followed by 5 years of tamoxifen is superior to local treatment alone in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease (stage IV-NED breast cancer). Patients with breast cancer were eligible if they had histologic proof of a locoregional or distant recurrence that had been curatively resected, irradiated, or both and had no other evidence of disease. Patients who had received prior anthracycline therapy were not eligible. All patients received six cycles of intravenous FAC, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. After completion of chemotherapy, patients whose tumors had not previously demonstrated resistance to tamoxifen and had positive or unknown estrogen receptor status received tamoxifen 20 mg by mouth daily for 5 years. Patients in this study were compared with a historical control population (patients with stage IV-NED breast cancer who never received systemic therapy) as well as with the patients in two previously reported trials of chemotherapy for stage IV-NED disease. Forty-seven patients were registered, but only 45 were evaluable. There was a highly statistically significant difference ( p < 0.001) in OS and DFS among the four groups, with patients in our most recent study having the best OS and DFS at 3 years compared with the control group (84% vs. 55% and 66% vs. 11%, respectively). When patients in all four groups were analyzed together in search of prognostic factors, we found that patients whose primary tumors had negative axillary lymph nodes had a statistically significant improvement in OS and DFS ( p < 0.01) compared with patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. No survival differences were found between patients with positive and those with negative hormone receptor status. This study demonstrates a benefit in terms of OS and DFS for patients with stage IV-NED breast cancer who receive doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The benefit was greater on patients with node-negative primary tumors. In patients with stage IV-NED disease, doxorubicin-based chemotherapy should be considered standard treatment after adequate local control is achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11856154     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08002.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  8 in total

Review 1.  Improvement of survival and prospect of cure in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Yee Chung Cheng; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 2.  Metastasectomy and surgical resection of the primary tumor in patients with stage IV breast cancer: time for a second look?

Authors:  Barbara A Pockaj; Nabil Wasif; Amylou C Dueck; Dennis A Wigle; Judy C Boughey; Amy C Degnim; Richard J Gray; Sarah A McLaughlin; Donald W Northfelt; Robert P Sticca; James W Jakub; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease is associated with improved survival.

Authors:  Julie E Lang; Welela Tereffe; Melissa P Mitchell; Roshni Rao; Lei Feng; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Isabelle Bedrosian; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Gildy V Babiera
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: can metastatic breast cancer be cured?

Authors:  Olivia Pagani; Elzbieta Senkus; William Wood; Marco Colleoni; Tanja Cufer; Stella Kyriakides; Alberto Costa; Eric P Winer; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Intensive post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients with tumour markers: CEA, TPA or CA15.3 vs MCA and MCA-CA15.3 vs CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel in the early detection of distant metastases.

Authors:  Andrea Nicolini; Gianna Tartarelli; Angelo Carpi; Maria Rita Metelli; Paola Ferrari; Loretta Anselmi; Massimo Conte; Piero Berti; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Defining the survival benchmark for breast cancer patients with systemic relapse.

Authors:  Simon B Zeichner; Tadeu Ambros; John Zaravinos; Alberto J Montero; Reshma L Mahtani; Eugene R Ahn; Aruna Mani; Nathan J Markward; Charles L Vogel
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  Radiation dose escalation for loco-regional recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy.

Authors:  Heath D Skinner; Eric A Strom; Sabin B Motwani; Wendy A Woodward; Marjorie C Green; Gildy Babiera; Daniel J Booser; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for thoracic node metastases: a safe and effective treatment for a neglected disease.

Authors:  Davide Franceschini; Fiorenza De Rose; Antonella Fogliata; Piera Navarria; Anna Maria Ascolese; Ciro Franzese; Tiziana Comito; Angelo Tozzi; Cristina Iftode; Lucia Di Brina; Giuseppe D'Agostino; Elena Clerici; Luca Cozzi; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.