Literature DB >> 11856094

Coding errors: a comparative analysis of hospital and prospectively collected departmental data.

H A Khwaja1, H Syed, D W Cranston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of a hospital coding database at a busy tertiary referral urological unit.
METHODS: Prospectively collected departmental coding data for all urological patients attending the Churchill Hospital, Oxford between 1 May 1999 and 30 April 2000 were compared with the coding data entered by hospital coding clerks on the Oxford Radcliffe NHS Trust database.
RESULTS: There were significant discrepancies between the number of patients on the hospital and the departmental database (639 vs 1109). There were gross procedural coding errors in 74 cases.
CONCLUSION: Hospital-coded data in this study were incomplete and inaccurate. This has important implications when considering the validity of hospital-trust databases when used as a source for medical research, clinical audit and as a representation of a consultants' clinical workload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11856094     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01428.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of factors influencing accuracy of principal procedure coding based on ICD-9-CM: an Iranian study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Farzandipour; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-05-07

2.  Modelling of errors in databases.

Authors:  Steve Gallivan; Christina Pagel
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-03

3.  Extracting data from electronic medical records: validation of a natural language processing program to assess prostate biopsy results.

Authors:  Anil A Thomas; Chengyi Zheng; Howard Jung; Allen Chang; Brian Kim; Joy Gelfond; Jeff Slezak; Kim Porter; Steven J Jacobsen; Gary W Chien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The validity of the diagnostic code for hidradenitis suppurativa in an electronic database.

Authors:  G E Kim; J Shlyankevich; A B Kimball
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Development and Performance of Electronic Pediatric Risk of Mortality and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 Automated Acuity Scores.

Authors:  Christopher M Horvat; Henry Ogoe; Sajel Kantawala; Alicia K Au; Ericka L Fink; Eric Yablonsky; Patrick M Kochanek; Srinivasan Suresh; Robert S B Clark
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Regional Cost Variations of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Open Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Parth K Modi; Neal Patel; Rutveej Patel; Amirali H Salmasi; Jaspreet S Parihar; Eric A Singer; Isaac Y Kim
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Performance of partial cystectomy in the United States from 2001 to 2010: trends and comparative outcomes.

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Viktor Dombrovskiy; Christopher Koprowski; Eric A Singer; Thomas L Jang; Robert E Weiss
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.344

8.  Epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in Oslo, Norway.

Authors:  C M Lofthus; F Frihagen; H E Meyer; L Nordsletten; K Melhuus; J A Falch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Values and pitfalls of the use of administrative databases for outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Emilie K Johnson; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Potential misclassification of patients with psoriasis in electronic databases.

Authors:  Murat Icen; Cynthia S Crowson; Marian T McEvoy; Sherine E Gabriel; Hilal Maradit Kremers
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 11.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.