Literature DB >> 11855450

What's best? Clinical indicators of quality in residential aged care facilities.

B M Courtney1, L Spencer.   

Abstract

This paper reports on the views of 36 registered nurses (RNs) in Phase One of a three stage study, Quality of Care for Residents in Aged Care Facilities. Case studies were conducted in nine residential aged care facilities and data were collected from informants using semi-structured interviews, participant observation and document analysis and review. Of the 36 RNs, almost three quarters (n=26) provided care at the bedside and ten held managerial positions. Each volunteered to participate. When asked to nominate the major clinical indicators of high quality residential aged care, all 26 RNs who worked at the bedside stated that the absence of decubitis ulcers was the pre-eminent measurable factor. While five managerial RNs also mentioned low rates of pressure ulcers, only two ranked it as the most important clinical indicator of high quality care. Hydration management was the clinical indicator nominated most frequently by managerial nurses. The one indicator of equal importance to both groups, but for different reasons, was that of poly pharmacy. The differences in priorities between each group were statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11855450     DOI: 10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60360-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Collegian        ISSN: 1322-7696            Impact factor:   2.573


  1 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: study protocol for a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857).

Authors:  Patriek Mistiaen; Wilco Achterberg; Andre Ament; Ruud Halfens; Janneke Huizinga; Ken Montgomery; Henri Post; Anneke L Francke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.