Literature DB >> 1185484

Effects of standing position on spontaneous uterine contractility and other aspects of labor.

C Méndez-Bauer, J Arroyo, C García Ramos, A Menéndez, M Lavilla, F Izquierdo, I Villa Elízaga, J Zamarriego.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper has been to compare the uterine contractility, pain produced by contractions and comfort of the patients between standing and supine position. The study has been performed in twenty normal nulliparae who were changed from supine to standing position and viceversa at intervals of approximately thirty minutes. Intrauterine pressure and fetal heart rate were continuously monitored. Cervial dilatation was evaluated every thirty minutes. No medication was given to the patients. They were asked to assess the pain produced by uterine contractions in each one of both positions and which was the more comfortable. It has been found: 1. That the intensity of contractions was significantly higher in fifteen out of the twenty patients in standing position. 2. Frequency of contractions diminished significantly in one third of the patients. 3. Uterine activity increased significantly in half of them. 4. Consistently, less pain accompanied uterine contractions in standing position. 5. Patients reported more comfort in this position. The average duration of labor was 3 hrs 55 min. This duration is short, compared with standard clinical experience and with published data. No complications occurred, by the use of standing position during labor, on the mother or fetus. The physiological mechanisms responsible for the above mentioned effects of standing position are unknown. It is condluced that there are no clear arguments against the use of standing position during labor and that this position should be used more frequently in clinical obstetrics, provided obstetrical conditions are similar to those reported in this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1185484     DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1975.3.2.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  14 in total

1.  Anal sphincter lacerations and upright delivery postures--a risk analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Inga Ragnar; Asa Ekström; Tanja Tydén; Sven-Eric Olsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-04-25

2.  Alternative birth positions.

Authors:  A J Reid; N L Harris
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  "Natural" childbirth among the Kankanaly-Igorot.

Authors:  N Kohnen
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1986-09

4.  Walking through labour.

Authors:  G Chamberlain; M Stewart
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-10-03

Review 5.  Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  Marion Kibuka; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-24

6.  Ambulation in labour.

Authors:  A M Flynn; J Kelly; G Hollins; P F Lynch
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-08-26

7.  Continuous fetal monitoring in the ambulant patient in labour.

Authors:  A Flynn; J Kelly
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-10-09

Review 8.  Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  Janesh K Gupta; Akanksha Sood; G Justus Hofmeyr; Joshua P Vogel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-25

9.  Predictors for health facility delivery in Busia district of Uganda: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Agnes Anyait; David Mukanga; George Bwire Oundo; Fred Nuwaha
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  Kate F Walker; Marion Kibuka; Jim G Thornton; Nia W Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.