Peter Thelin Schmidt1, Ayhan Bozkurt, Per M Hellström. 1. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Peter.Thelin.Schmidt@medks.ki.se
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Tachykinins stimulate motility whereas NO inhibits motility in the gastrointestinal tract. AIM: To investigate if inhibition of NO production sensitizes myoelectric activity to subthreshold doses of tachykinins in the small intestine of awake rats. METHODS: Rats were supplied with a venous catheter and bipolar electrodes at 5, 15 and 25 cm distal to pylorus for electromyography of small intestine. The motor responses were evaluated using pattern recognition. Substance P and neurokinin A dose-dependently stimulated gut motility, with neurokinin A being more potent than substance P. Therefore, neurokinin A was chosen and administered under baseline conditions and 45-60 min after N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) 1 mg kg(-1), with or without pretreatment with L-arginine 300 mg kg(-1). In addition, myoelectric activity effects of neurokinin A in conjunction with L-NNA were studied before and after administration of the tachykinin receptor antagonists, SR140333 (NK1), SR48968 (NK2) and SR142801 (NK3), each at 2.5 mg kg(-1). RESULTS: Dose-finding studies verified 10 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) to be the threshold dose at which NKA caused phase II-like activity in a low percentage of experiments (12%, n=41). This dose was therefore used in combination with L-NNA for sensitization experiments of gut myoelectric activity. In experiments where NKA-induced no response, pretreatment with L-NNA led to phase II-like activity in 9 of 18 (50%, p<0.05) experiments. Co-administration of SR140333 and SR48968 abolished this effect. CONCLUSION: NO counteracts the stimulatory effect of tachykinins on small bowel myoelectric activity in the rat. Inhibition of the L-arginine/NO pathway sensitizes the gut to tachykinin-stimulated motor activity.
UNLABELLED: Tachykinins stimulate motility whereas NO inhibits motility in the gastrointestinal tract. AIM: To investigate if inhibition of NO production sensitizes myoelectric activity to subthreshold doses of tachykinins in the small intestine of awake rats. METHODS:Rats were supplied with a venous catheter and bipolar electrodes at 5, 15 and 25 cm distal to pylorus for electromyography of small intestine. The motor responses were evaluated using pattern recognition. Substance P and neurokinin A dose-dependently stimulated gut motility, with neurokinin A being more potent than substance P. Therefore, neurokinin A was chosen and administered under baseline conditions and 45-60 min after N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) 1 mg kg(-1), with or without pretreatment with L-arginine 300 mg kg(-1). In addition, myoelectric activity effects of neurokinin A in conjunction with L-NNA were studied before and after administration of the tachykinin receptor antagonists, SR140333 (NK1), SR48968 (NK2) and SR142801 (NK3), each at 2.5 mg kg(-1). RESULTS: Dose-finding studies verified 10 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) to be the threshold dose at which NKA caused phase II-like activity in a low percentage of experiments (12%, n=41). This dose was therefore used in combination with L-NNA for sensitization experiments of gut myoelectric activity. In experiments where NKA-induced no response, pretreatment with L-NNA led to phase II-like activity in 9 of 18 (50%, p<0.05) experiments. Co-administration of SR140333 and SR48968 abolished this effect. CONCLUSION: NO counteracts the stimulatory effect of tachykinins on small bowel myoelectric activity in the rat. Inhibition of the L-arginine/NO pathway sensitizes the gut to tachykinin-stimulated motor activity.