Literature DB >> 11853531

Quantitative assessments of sensitivity to reinforcement contingencies in mental retardation.

William V Dube1, William J McIlvane.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to differences in reinforcement contingencies was examined in 6 individuals with mental retardation. A concurrent operants procedure was implemented in the context of a computer game. Participants selected two different types of animated figures displayed concurrently in the left and right portions of a touchscreen monitor. Over a series of conditions, the relative rates or magnitudes of reinforcers following selections of the two options were changed in ratios of 5:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5. Sensitivity was quantified by application of the generalized matching equation. Results included individual differences in sensitivity and differential sensitivity to rate and magnitude variation. The results suggest that comprehensive assessments of potential reinforcers may benefit from including tests of delivery parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11853531     DOI: 10.1352/0895-8017(2002)107<0136:QAOSTR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ment Retard        ISSN: 0895-8017


  5 in total

1.  Stimulus control topography coherence theory: foundations and extensions.

Authors:  William J McIlvane; William V Dube
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Disrupted stimulus control but not reward sensitivity in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a matching law analysis.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Rose Hawthorn; Sam Bolger; Katie Meredith; Ruth Bishop
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-11

3.  The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.

Authors:  Stephanie T Stilling; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Extended pausing by humans on multiple fixed-ratio schedules with varied reinforcer magnitude and response requirements.

Authors:  Dean C Williams; Kathryn J Saunders; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Algorithmic analysis of relational learning processes in instructional technology: Some implications for basic, translational, and applied research.

Authors:  William J McIlvane; Joanne B Kledaras; Christophe J Gerard; Lorin Wilde; David Smelson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.