Literature DB >> 11853240

Incidence of root fractures and methods used for post removal.

P V Abbott1.   

Abstract

AIM: This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of root fractures during post removal, as well as the methods used and the success rates achieved with various post removal devices and techniques.
METHODOLOGY: Patient records from a specialist endodontic practice were examined. A total of 1600 teeth from which posts were removed were identified. These teeth had no preoperative signs or symptoms to suggest root fractures. The incidence of root fractures was determined and a subset of 234 patient records were examined in detail to determine the methods used to remove different types of posts.
RESULTS: Only one tooth fractured during post removal (0.06%) and all posts were successfully removed, typically in about 3 min. Most cast posts were removed with an Eggler post remover but some dislodged when the crown was removed; ultrasonics was used occasionally. Most parallel-sided posts were removed with ultrasonics and threaded posts were unscrewed. The Masserann kit and ultrasonics were combined to remove fractured cast posts and some parallel-sided posts.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that, with good case selection, post removal is a predictable procedure. If appropriate techniques and devices are used for the particular type of post being removed, then root fracture is a rare occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11853240     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00457.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  10 in total

1.  Restoration of the root canal treated tooth.

Authors:  S Eliyas; J Jalili; N Martin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Micro-surgical endodontics.

Authors:  S Eliyas; J Vere; Z Ali; I Harris
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Direct or indirect post crowns to restore compromised teeth: a review of the literature.

Authors:  T A Owen; M Barber
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Retrieval of a separated instrument using Masserann technique.

Authors:  Arun Kulandaivelu Thirumalai; Mahalaxmi Sekar; Sumitha Mylswamy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-01

5.  Influence of luting agents on time required for cast post removal by ultrasound: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Janir Alves Soares; Manoel Brito-Júnior; Dimitri Ribas Fonseca; Anielo Faleiro Melo; Suelleng Maria Cunha Santos; Nadia Del Carmen Soto Sotomayor; Neilor Mateus Antunes Braga; André Luis Faria e Silva
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Management of an intracanal separated instrument: a case report.

Authors:  Dipti Choksi; Barkha Idnani; Devendra Kalaria; Ronak N Patel
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-10-07

7.  Effect of ultrasonic tip designs on intraradicular post removal.

Authors:  Anny Carine Barros Aguiar; Daniely Amorim de Meireles; André Augusto Franco Marques; Emílio Carlos Sponchiado Júnior; Angela Delfina Bitencourt Garrido; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-07-17

8.  Efficiency of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in Debonding Cemented Glass Fiber Posts: an in vitro Study.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Zamanian; Seyed Mohammad Reza Hakimaneh; Seyed Masoud Mojahedi; Farnaz Taghavi Damghani; Fatemesadat Shayegh; Sayed Shojaedin Shayegh
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2021-03

9.  Effectiveness of different fiber post removal techniques and their influence on dentinal microcrack formation.

Authors:  Franziska Haupt; Insa Riggers; Frank Konietschke; Tina Rödig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Removal of failed crown and bridge.

Authors:  Ashu Sharma; G R Rahul; Soorya T Poduval; Karunakar Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2012-07-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.