Literature DB >> 11852160

Choosing an equivalence limit for noninferiority or equivalence studies.

Brian L Wiens1.   

Abstract

Studies that compare treatments with the purpose of demonstrating that the treatments are similar require an a priori definition of an equivalence limit, how different the treatments can be before the difference is of concern. Defining such an equivalence limit is one of the most difficult aspects of planning the study. Three principles are proposed for setting such limits, depending on the objective of the study: a putative placebo calculation, an approach based on clinically important differences, and methods based on statistical properties. All methods will be useful for many studies, but the study objective should determine the final choice of an equivalence limit. The statistician must play an integral role in determining the final equivalence limit. Advice is offered for helping the statistician participate in the decision on the equivalence limits.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11852160     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00196-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  25 in total

Review 1.  Statistics in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephanie J Green; Donna K Pauler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  A randomized clinical trial of transdiagnostic cognitve-behavioral treatments for anxiety disorder by comparison to relaxation training.

Authors:  Peter J Norton
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2011-05-25

3.  Mental Vitality @ Work: The effectiveness of a mental module for workers' health surveillance for nurses and allied health professionals, comparing two approaches in a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah M Ketelaar; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Fania R Gärtner; Linda Bolier; Odile Smeets; Judith K Sluiter
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Bayesian data analysis for newcomers.

Authors:  John K Kruschke; Torrin M Liddell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

5.  In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

Review 6.  Methodological aspects of superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials.

Authors:  Roumeliotis Stefanos; D 'Arrigo Graziella; Tripepi Giovanni
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  Noninferiority trial design and analysis with an ordered three-level categorical endpoint.

Authors:  Erica Brittain; Zonghui Hu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Transdiagnostic versus diagnosis-specific cbt for anxiety disorders: a preliminary randomized controlled noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Peter J Norton; Terri L Barrera
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.505

9.  Noninferiority and equivalence designs: issues and implications for mental health research.

Authors:  Carolyn J Greene; Leslie A Morland; Valerie L Durkalski; B Christopher Frueh
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2008-10

10.  Evaluation of the nano-oligosaccharide factor lipido-colloid matrix in the local management of venous leg ulcers: results of a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Schmutz; Sylvie Meaume; Ségolène Fays; Zohva Ourabah; Bernard Guillot; Valéne Thirion; Mark Collier; Simon Barrett; J Smith; Serge Bohbot; Anne Dompmartin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.