Literature DB >> 11850326

Collaborative testing enhances student learning.

Sumangala P Rao1, Heidi L Collins, Stephen E DiCarlo.   

Abstract

Examinations and quizzes should be used as learning as well as assessment tools. To achieve this goal, an assessment procedure was developed to enhance as well as assess student learning. Students were tested on four different topics of cardiovascular physiology. Each topic was tested by a different type of quiz (fill in the blanks, single best response multiple choice, short essay, or true/false). The students first completed a quiz individually. Once the quiz was completed individually, the students completed the same quiz in groups. Eighty percent of the score on the quiz was based on the individual results, and 20% of the score on the quiz was based on the group results. The performance on the quizzes was significantly higher (P < 0.001) when students completed the quizzes in groups than when they completed the quizzes individually. Results document that completing the quizzes in groups enhances the understanding of the material. In addition, students rated this format superior to the traditional method.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11850326     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00032.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  8 in total

1.  Effect of Collaborative vs. Noncollaborative Quizzes on Examination Scores in a Pharmaceutical Calculations Course.

Authors:  Stephanie Enz; Donald R Frosch
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  The practical examination types (spot test and slide test) of gross anatomy course in faculty of medicine: a simultaneous evaluation of the aspect of student success.

Authors:  Kemal Emre Özen; Kübra Erdoğan; Burhan Yarar; Gizem Çizmeci; Gonca Ay Keselik; Ferhan Elmalı; Mehmet Ali Malas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Requiring students to justify answer changes during collaborative testing may be necessary for improved academic performance.

Authors:  Niu Zhang; Charles N R Henderson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-02-03

4.  Learning styles of medical students at Taibah University: Trends and implications.

Authors:  Shaista Salman Guraya; Salman Yousuf Guraya; Fawzia A Habib; Khalid I Khoshhal
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  The Two-Stage Examination: A Method to Assess Individual Competence and Collaborative Problem Solving in Medical Students.

Authors:  Janet E Lindsley; David A Morton; Karly Pippitt; Sara Lamb; Jorie M Colbert-Getz
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance.

Authors:  James E Cooke; Laura Weir; Bridgette Clarkston
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.

Authors:  Hayley Leight; Cheston Saunders; Robin Calkins; Michelle Withers
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  University engagement and collaborative learning in nursing students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

Authors:  Esmat Noohi; Abas Abaszadeh; Sadat Sayad Bagher Maddah
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.