Literature DB >> 11850046

NEO-FFI factor scores as predictors of clinical response to fluoxetine in depressed outpatients.

Timothy Petersen1, George I Papakostas, Kathryn Bottonari, Brian Iacoviello, Jonathan E Alpert, Maurizio Fava, Andrew A Nierenberg.   

Abstract

Research in unipolar depression suggests that neuroticism is associated with poor long-term outcome and greater chronicity. The objective of this study was to determine whether baseline neuroticism scores predict response to treatment with fluoxetine in depressed outpatients. Seventy-six depressed outpatients participating in a clinical trial of fluoxetine (fixed/flexible dosing) completed the NEO-FFI (five factor inventory short form) at baseline. Clinical response was defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) total score (final visit--baseline). Logistic regression evaluated NEO-FFI factor scores as predictors of treatment outcome within an intent-to-treat model. Scores on the neuroticism scale were not found to significantly predict treatment response as measured by the HAM-D-17. Strengths of this study include a standardized treatment protocol and use of structured interview instruments, while limitations include a modest sample size, lack of continuation data, state/trait effects, and lack of generalizability to other antidepressant treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11850046     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00359-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  9 in total

1.  Methodology and preliminary results from the neurobiology of late-life depression study.

Authors:  David C Steffens; Kevin J Manning; Rong Wu; James J Grady; Richard H Fortinsky; Howard A Tennen
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.878

2.  Neuroticism but not omega-3 fatty acid levels correlate with early responsiveness to escitalopram.

Authors:  Jess G Fiedorowicz; Nancy Hale; Arthur A Spector; William H Coryell
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.567

3.  The direct and interactive effects of neuroticism and life stress on the severity and longitudinal course of depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Timothy A Brown; Anthony J Rosellini
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-03-07

4.  Prediction of response to medication and cognitive therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe depression.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Robert J DeRubeis; Richard C Shelton; Steven D Hollon; Jay D Amsterdam; Robert Gallop
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-08

5.  Personality and differential treatment response in major depression: a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive-behavioural therapy and pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  R Michael Bagby; Lena C Quilty; Zindel V Segal; Carolina C McBride; Sidney H Kennedy; Paul T Costa
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Personality as a Predictor of Treatment Response to Escitalopram in Adults With Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Authors:  Angela Fang; Rachel Porth; Katharine A Phillips; Sabine Wilhelm
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.325

7.  Clinical outcomes of older depressed patients with and without comorbid neuroticism.

Authors:  David C Steffens; Douglas R McQuoid; Moria J Smoski; Guy G Potter
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.878

8.  Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression.

Authors:  Andre G Bastos; Luciano S Guimarães; Clarissa M Trentini
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.697

Review 9.  Predictors, moderators, and mediators (correlates) of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  George I Papakostas; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.986

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.