Literature DB >> 11848716

Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study.

D D Langleben1, L Schroeder, J A Maldjian, R C Gur, S McDonald, J D Ragland, C P O'Brien, A R Childress.   

Abstract

TheGuilty Knowledge Test (GKT) has been used extensively to model deception. An association between the brain evoked response potentials and lying on the GKT suggests that deception may be associated with changes in other measures of brain activity such as regional blood flow that could be anatomically localized with event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI contrasts between deceptive and truthful responses were measured with a 4 Tesla scanner in 18 participants performing the GKT and analyzed using statistical parametric mapping. Increased activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and the left premotor, motor, and anterior parietal cortex was specifically associated with deceptive responses. The results indicate that: (a) cognitive differences between deception and truth have neural correlates detectable by fMRI, (b) inhibition of the truthful response may be a basic component of intentional deception, and (c) ACC and SFG are components of the basic neural circuitry for deception. ©2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11848716     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  68 in total

1.  The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information.

Authors:  Charlotte Schwedes; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Eric Racine
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  What can neuroscience contribute to ethics?

Authors:  T Buller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Localisation of increased prefrontal white matter in pathological liars.

Authors:  Yaling Yang; Adrian Raine; Katherine L Narr; Todd Lencz; Lori LaCasse; Patrick Colletti; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Brain Imaging: A Decade of Coverage in the Print Media.

Authors:  Eric Racine; Ofek Bar-Ilan; Judy Illes
Journal:  Sci Commun       Date:  2006-09

7.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Are there theory of mind regions in the brain? A review of the neuroimaging literature.

Authors:  Sarah J Carrington; Anthony J Bailey
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  [Forensic psychiatry in the era of neuroscience: present status and outlook for neurobiological research].

Authors:  J L Müller
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.214

10.  Cognitive neuroscience of honesty and deception: A signaling framework.

Authors:  Adrianna Jenkins; Lusha Zhu; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.