BACKGROUND: We review the evidence for the familiality of major depressive disorder (MDD) and the genetic aetiology of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. METHODS: Databases and reference lists were searched for family, twin and adoption studies of childhood MDD and childhood depressive symptoms. Data from independent family studies that fulfilled specified inclusion criteria were pooled and odds ratios were calculated for top-down and bottom-up family studies. RESULTS: Estimates of familial risk differ by control group and by study design (odds ratio range 1.70, 3.98). Twin studies show that depressive symptoms in young people are heritable although rater and measurement issues are important. Adoption studies show little evidence for a genetic influence on depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: MDD in young people is familial although control group and study design affect the magnitude of the familial risk. Estimates of heritability from twin and adoption studies vary widely and few firm conclusions can be made regarding the genetic aetiology of depressive symptoms in childhood. Areas that require future work include the examination of rater effects, measurement issues, the effects of age and comorbidity and reasons for the discrepancy between twin and adoption findings.
BACKGROUND: We review the evidence for the familiality of major depressive disorder (MDD) and the genetic aetiology of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. METHODS: Databases and reference lists were searched for family, twin and adoption studies of childhood MDD and childhood depressive symptoms. Data from independent family studies that fulfilled specified inclusion criteria were pooled and odds ratios were calculated for top-down and bottom-up family studies. RESULTS: Estimates of familial risk differ by control group and by study design (odds ratio range 1.70, 3.98). Twin studies show that depressive symptoms in young people are heritable although rater and measurement issues are important. Adoption studies show little evidence for a genetic influence on depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:MDD in young people is familial although control group and study design affect the magnitude of the familial risk. Estimates of heritability from twin and adoption studies vary widely and few firm conclusions can be made regarding the genetic aetiology of depressive symptoms in childhood. Areas that require future work include the examination of rater effects, measurement issues, the effects of age and comorbidity and reasons for the discrepancy between twin and adoption findings.
Authors: Erin C Dunn; Monica Uddin; S V Subramanian; Jordan W Smoller; Sandro Galea; Karestan C Koenen Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Monica Uddin; Karestan C Koenen; Regina de Los Santos; Erin Bakshis; Allison E Aiello; Sandro Galea Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Misaki N Natsuaki; Daniel S Shaw; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Jody M Ganiban; Gordon T Harold; David Reiss; Leslie D Leve Journal: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Date: 2014-12