Literature DB >> 11848269

The contribution of gender-role orientation, work factors and home stressors to psychological well-being and sickness absence in male- and female-dominated occupational groups.

Olga Evans1, Andrew Steptoe.   

Abstract

The associations of work stress, types of work and gender-role orientation with psychological well-being and sickness absence were investigated in a questionnaire survey of 588 male and female nurses and 387 male and female accountants. We hypothesised that health might be impaired among women working in the male-dominated occupation (accountancy), and men in the female-dominated occupation (nursing), but that effects might be moderated by job strain (perceptions of high demand and low control), work and home hassles, and traditional male (instrumentality) and female (expressivity) psychological characteristics. Responses were analysed from 172 female and 61 male nurses, and from 53 female and 81 male commercial accountants. Female accountants were more likely than other groups to have high anxiety scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales, while male nurses had the highest rates of sickness absence. Male nurses and female accountants also reported more work-related hassles than did female nurses and male accountants. Men and women in the same occupation did not differ in job strain or job social support, but nurses reported greater job strain than accountants, due to higher ratings of demands and lower skill utilisation. After adjusting for age, sex, occupation, paid work hours and a measure of social desirability bias, risk of elevated anxiety was independently associated with higher job strain, lower job social support, more work hassles, more domestic responsibility, lower instrumentality and higher expressivity. The association between sex and anxiety was no longer significant after instrumentality had been entered into the regression model. Sickness absence of more than three days over the past 12 months was independently associated with higher job strain, more work hassles, lower instrumentality and higher expressivity. The results suggest that when men and women occupy jobs in which they are in the cultural and numerical minority, there may be adverse health effects that are gender-specific. Psychological traits related to socially constructed gender roles may also be relevant, and mediate in part the differences in psychological well-being between men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11848269     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  32 in total

1.  Changing work, changing health: can real work-time flexibility promote health behaviors and well-being?

Authors:  Phyllis Moen; Erin L Kelly; Eric Tranby; Qinlei Huang
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2011-12

2.  Job strain and sick leave among Japanese employees: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Kyoko Kondo; Yuka Kobayashi; Kumi Hirokawa; Akizumi Tsutsumi; Fumio Kobayashi; Takashi Haratani; Shunichi Araki; Norito Kawakami
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Risk of affective and stress related disorders among employees in human service professions.

Authors:  J Wieclaw; E Agerbo; P B Mortensen; J P Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Comparing working conditions and physical and psychological health complaints in four occupational groups working in female-dominated workplaces.

Authors:  Karina Nielsen; Karen Albertsen; Sten-Olof Brenner; Lars Smith-Hansen; Christian Roepsdorff
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Learning from a Natural Experiment: Studying a Corporate Work-Time Policy Initiative.

Authors:  Phyllis Moen; Erin Kelly; Kelly Chermack
Journal:  Work Life Policies       Date:  2009

6.  Does occupational gender segregation influence the association of effort-reward imbalance with myocardial infarction in the SHEEP study?

Authors:  Richard Peter; Anne Hammarström; Johan Hallqvist; Johannes Siegrist; Töres Theorell
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2006

7.  Reactivity to daily stressors in adulthood: the importance of stressor type in characterizing risk factors.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Hay; Manfred Diehl
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-03

8.  Exploring within- and between-gender differences in burnout: 8 different occupational groups.

Authors:  Siw Tone Innstrand; Ellen Melbye Langballe; Erik Falkum; Olaf Gjerløw Aasland
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Gender/Sex Differences in the Relationship between Psychosocial Work Exposures and Work and Life Stress.

Authors:  Kathy Padkapayeva; Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet; Amber Bielecky; Selahadin Ibrahim; Cameron Mustard; Chantal Brisson; Peter Smith
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.179

10.  Work stress, sleep deficiency, and predicted 10-year cardiometabolic risk in a female patient care worker population.

Authors:  Henrik B Jacobsen; Silje E Reme; Grace Sembajwe; Karen Hopcia; Tore C Stiles; Glorian Sorensen; James H Porter; Miguel Marino; Orfeu M Buxton
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.