Literature DB >> 11848188

Comparison of the cytotoxic effects and smear layer removing capacity of oxidative potential water, NaOCl and EDTA.

A Serper1, S Calt, A L Dogan, D Guc, B Ozçelik, T Kuraner.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study compared the smear layer removing capability and cytotoxicity of NaOCl, EDTA and Oxidative Potential Water (OPW). Fifteen extracted single-rooted human upper incisors were examined in three groups. The root canals were enlarged to the apical foramen with K files to size #60 and irrigated with: (a) NaOCl followed by OPW, (b) OPW during and after instrumentation and (c) NaOCl followed by EDTA and NaOCl. The effect of these irrigants on the smear layer was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. In vitro cytotoxicity of these irrigants was examined by MTT colorimetric assay. We found that the combination of NaOCl and OPW as well as the application of OPW alone, failed to remove the smear layer from the apical third, whereas the EDTA and NaOCl combination achieved complete removal. OPW, when used during and after instrumentation, removed the smear layer in the middle third more effectively than NaOCl followed by OPW. EDTA exerted more cytotoxic effects at all concentrations tested when compared with OPW and NaOCl. IN
CONCLUSION: (a) OPW was less cytotoxic than other irrigants but did not effectively remove the smear layer, (b) treatment with EDTA followed by NaOCl efficiently removed of the smear layer, but their cytotoxicity should be considered during endodontic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11848188     DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.43.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Sci        ISSN: 1343-4934            Impact factor:   1.556


  7 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemically activated solutions: evidence for antimicrobial efficacy and applications in healthcare environments.

Authors:  R M S Thorn; S W H Lee; G M Robinson; J Greenman; D M Reynolds
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Assessment of genotoxic effect of maleic acid and EDTA: a comparative in vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Nidambur Vasudev Ballal; Bhuvanagiri Nageshwar Rao; Kundabala Mala; Kadengodlu Seetharama Bhat; Bola Sadashiva Satish Rao
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Cytotoxicity of QMix™ endodontic irrigating solution on human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Ahmad Alkahtani; Sarah M Alkahtany; Amer Mahmood; Mona A Elsafadi; Abdullah M Aldahmash; Sukumaran Anil
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate application for remaining carious dentin disinfection.

Authors:  Jorgiana Silva de Assis; Ramille Araujio Lima; Juliana Paiva Marques Lima; Lidiany Karle Azevedo Rodrigues; Sérgio Lima Santiago
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

5.  Toxicity of chlorhexidine on odontoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Fernanda Campos Rosetti Lessa; Andreza Maria Fabio Aranha; Indri Nogueira; Elisa Maria Aparecida Giro; Josimeri Hebling; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Evaluation of the chelating effect of chitosan solubilized in different acids.

Authors:  Paôla Caroline da Silva Mira; Luis Eduardo Souza-Flamini; Debora Fernandes da Costa Guedes; Antonio Miranda Da Cruz-Filho
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

7.  Cytotoxicity of Endodontic Irrigants on Human Periodontal Ligament Cells.

Authors:  Hamed Karkehabadi; Hosnieh Yousefifakhr; Saeede Zadsirjan
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.