Literature DB >> 11845758

Learning intravenous cannulation: a comparison of the conventional method and the CathSim Intravenous Training System.

Katherine Ka-Pik Chang1, Joanne Wai-Yee Chung, Thomas Kwok-Sing Wong.   

Abstract

Intravenous cannulation is a nursing procedure carried out in some clinical units that may induce trauma and discomfort. Nurses should be well prepared before practising the procedure with clients. Conventionally, a plastic arm was used for practice but, with innovative developments in technology, a computer program called the CathSim Intravenous Training System (CathSim ITS) is available for this purpose. This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of learning using a plastic arm with the CathSim ITS. Twenty-eight nurses were divided into two groups and randomly assigned to the two different methods: plastic arm (control group) or CathSim ITS (experimental group). Both groups were provided with 1 hour of theory input and 2 hours of nursing laboratory work. When the nurses felt ready to practise on clients, their performances were assessed by researchers with an intravenous cannulation qualification using a validated checklist. Prior to the assessment, trait and state anxiety levels were measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Hong Kong Chinese adaptation) to check whether anxiety would affect the performance. Following the assessment, a semi-structured interview was conducted to reveal my knowledge acquired through using the selected method. Both the control and CathSim ITS groups demonstrated a high success rate, scoring 100% and 92.86%, respectively, with their first client. The semi-structured interviews revealed that the CathSim ITS group appreciated several features of their assigned method. However, there is room for further development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11845758     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00561.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  4 in total

Review 1.  Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Ryan Brydges; Amy T Wang; David A Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators.

Authors:  Lenora A McWilliams; Ann Malecha
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-29

3.  Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  José Miguel Padilha; Paulo Puga Machado; Ana Ribeiro; José Ramos; Patrício Costa
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  A Simulated Clinical Skills Scenario to Teach Interprofessional Teamwork to Health Profession Students.

Authors:  Eileen Adel Herge; Christine Hsieh; Tarae Waddell-Terry; Pamela Keats
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2015-03-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.