Literature DB >> 11845340

[Application of guidelines for the treatment of headache and cancer pain by private practitioners].

F Elsner1, B Sonntag, N Schmeisser, P Kiencke, R Sabatowski, G Loick, L Radbruch.   

Abstract

In a regional pain management network in Cologne, sponsored by the German Ministry of Health, structures of outpatient pain treatment in general practice and the adherence to pain management guidelines were examined. The 3-year project was divided into a 1-year observational period to analyze the present state of outpatient pain management followed by a 2-year period of interventions such as consultations and educational training programs in pain treatment. Eighty physicians with different specializations working in general practice took part in the network. The knowledge of and adherence to the guidelines for the treatment of headache and cancer pain were examined by questionnaire surveys and six simulated patient cases. These investigations were performed yearly from 1997 to 2000. The adherence to the guidelines for the treatment of headache and cancer pain by the physicians participating in the network was low. The levels achieved for simulated cases of headache were higher than for cancer pain. The results of simulated patient cases from the beginning and the end of the project were available for comparison for 28 physicians. Evaluation of the physicians' assessment of the simulated patient cases increased only fractionally and was not significant in headache patients (median change of 0.67) and cancer pain patients (median change of 0.17). The network interventions resulted in a slight improvement in the knowledge of and attitudes to the treatment of headache and cancer pain as judged by simulated patient cases. This improvement, however, did not reach statistical significance. The small number of physicians answering at the beginning and at the end of the project made it difficult to draw a general conclusion on whether the interventions had led to an improvement in outpatient pain management in a larger group of physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11845340     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-001-0123-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  4 in total

1.  [General practitioners' guideline for palliative care. A survey of guideline acceptance in quality circles of primary medical care].

Authors:  Ingrid Schubert; Lothar Heymans; Joachim Fessler
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-03-28

2.  [Problems and deficits in the transition from inpatient and outpatient care of cancer patients. A qualitative analysis].

Authors:  S Stiel; R Joppich; K Korb; M Hahnen; F Elsner; R Rossaint; L Radbruch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Quality of analgesic treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: do we do a better job now? The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) experience.

Authors:  C Münger-Beyeler; J Bernhard; K Rufibach; R Morant; H-P Schmid
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  [Use of the World Health Organization guidelines on cancer pain relief before referral to a specialized pain service].

Authors:  P Felleiter; B Gustorff; P Lierz; S Hornykewycz; H G Kress
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.107

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.