Literature DB >> 11844826

Comparison of the systemic and intratumoral effects of tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitor vorozole in postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer.

Catherine L Harper-Wynne1, Nigel P M Sacks, Karyn Shenton, Fiona A MacNeill, Paul Sauven, Ian J Laidlaw, Zen Rayter, Stephanie Miall, Angela Howes, Janine Salter, Margaret J Hills, Frances M Lowe, Roger A'Hern, Nazar Nasiri, Debbie Doody, Jhangir Iqbal, Mitchell Dowsett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine biologic differences, if any, between presurgical endocrine treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (vorozole) and tamoxifen in patients with postmenopausal primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomization was to 12 weeks of 2.5 mg of vorozole per day or 20 mg of tamoxifen per day, both orally. Clinical response was assessed monthly together with serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estrogens (E1, E2, and E1S), lipids, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and bone metabolites (CrossLaps CTx). Tissue samples for Ki67, apoptotic index (AI), estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor were collected at 0, 2, and 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Ki67 fell by 58% and 43% (means) at 2 weeks in the vorozole and tamoxifen patients, respectively (P =.13). In the vorozole group, the correlations of proportional changes in Ki67 at 2 weeks with tumor volume changes and clinical response at 12 weeks were not significant (P =.09) and marginally significant (P =.04), respectively. Serum lipids did not differ between groups. Serum levels of EI, E2, and E1S were suppressed markedly by vorozole, whereas levels of SHBG increased and LH and FSH fell significantly with tamoxifen. IGF-1 levels fell significantly with tamoxifen (P =.001) compared with the nonsignificant rise with vorozole. Twelve-week CTx values fell by 19% with tamoxifen (P =.006) and rose by 11% with vorozole (P =.15).
CONCLUSION: The correlation with vorozole of Ki67 with volume and clinical response supports this as an intermediate marker. The nonsignificant effects on bone and lipid metabolism by the aromatase inhibitor may be important to consider for adjuvant and potential prevention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11844826     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.4.1026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

1.  Feasibility of Targeting PIK3CA Mutations in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Julie A Theurer; William Stecho; John Yoo; Keith Kwan; Bret Wehrli; Vimla Harry; Morgan Black; Nicole Pinto; Eric Winquist; David Palma; Suzanne Richter; John W Barrett; S Danielle MacNeil; Kevin Fung; Christopher J Howlett; Anthony C Nichols
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Modern Risk Assessment for Individualizing Treatment Concepts in Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Alex Farr; Rachel Wuerstlein; Annika Heiduschka; Christian F Singer; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure: manifestations and management.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; Debra L Barton; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Treatment response to preoperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: the relevance of proliferation and apoptosis rates.

Authors:  Ksenija Kanjer; Svetislav Tatić; Zora Nešković-Konstantinović; Zaki Abu Rabi; Dragica Nikolić-Vukosavljević
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Tamoxifen is an estrogen antagonist on gonadotropin secretion and responsiveness of the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal axis in female monkeys.

Authors:  M E Wilson; D Mook; F Graves; J Felger; I F Bielsky; K Wallen
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Reproductive steroid hormones and recurrence-free survival in women with a history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Cheryl L Rock; Shirley W Flatt; Gail A Laughlin; Ellen B Gold; Cynthia A Thomson; Loki Natarajan; Lovell A Jones; Bette J Caan; Marcia L Stefanick; Richard A Hajek; Wael K Al-Delaimy; Frank Z Stanczyk; John P Pierce
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Prevention and management of osteoporosis in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dawn Hershman; Rashmi Narayanan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Pathologic and biologic response to preoperative endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Yunn-Yi Chen; Sandy DeVries; Joseph Anderson; Juan Lessing; Rebecca Swain; Koei Chin; Veronica Shim; Laura J Esserman; Frederic M Waldman; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura M Spring; Arjun Gupta; Kerry L Reynolds; Michele A Gadd; Leif W Ellisen; Steven J Isakoff; Beverly Moy; Aditya Bardia
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  A randomised controlled phase II trial of pre-operative celecoxib treatment reveals anti-tumour transcriptional response in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Rita D Brandão; Jürgen Veeck; Koen K Van de Vijver; Patrick Lindsey; Bart de Vries; Catharina H M J van Elssen; Marinus J Blok; Kristien Keymeulen; Torik Ayoubi; Hubert J M Smeets; Vivianne C Tjan-Heijnen; Pierre S Hupperets
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.