PURPOSE: To determine biologic differences, if any, between presurgical endocrine treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (vorozole) and tamoxifen in patients with postmenopausal primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomization was to 12 weeks of 2.5 mg of vorozole per day or 20 mg of tamoxifen per day, both orally. Clinical response was assessed monthly together with serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estrogens (E1, E2, and E1S), lipids, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and bone metabolites (CrossLaps CTx). Tissue samples for Ki67, apoptotic index (AI), estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor were collected at 0, 2, and 12 weeks. RESULTS:Ki67 fell by 58% and 43% (means) at 2 weeks in the vorozole and tamoxifen patients, respectively (P =.13). In the vorozole group, the correlations of proportional changes in Ki67 at 2 weeks with tumor volume changes and clinical response at 12 weeks were not significant (P =.09) and marginally significant (P =.04), respectively. Serum lipids did not differ between groups. Serum levels of EI, E2, and E1S were suppressed markedly by vorozole, whereas levels of SHBG increased and LH and FSH fell significantly with tamoxifen. IGF-1 levels fell significantly with tamoxifen (P =.001) compared with the nonsignificant rise with vorozole. Twelve-week CTx values fell by 19% with tamoxifen (P =.006) and rose by 11% with vorozole (P =.15). CONCLUSION: The correlation with vorozole of Ki67 with volume and clinical response supports this as an intermediate marker. The nonsignificant effects on bone and lipid metabolism by the aromatase inhibitor may be important to consider for adjuvant and potential prevention strategies.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine biologic differences, if any, between presurgical endocrine treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (vorozole) and tamoxifen in patients with postmenopausal primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomization was to 12 weeks of 2.5 mg of vorozole per day or 20 mg of tamoxifen per day, both orally. Clinical response was assessed monthly together with serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estrogens (E1, E2, and E1S), lipids, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and bone metabolites (CrossLaps CTx). Tissue samples for Ki67, apoptotic index (AI), estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor were collected at 0, 2, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Ki67 fell by 58% and 43% (means) at 2 weeks in the vorozole and tamoxifenpatients, respectively (P =.13). In the vorozole group, the correlations of proportional changes in Ki67 at 2 weeks with tumor volume changes and clinical response at 12 weeks were not significant (P =.09) and marginally significant (P =.04), respectively. Serum lipids did not differ between groups. Serum levels of EI, E2, and E1S were suppressed markedly by vorozole, whereas levels of SHBG increased and LH and FSH fell significantly with tamoxifen. IGF-1 levels fell significantly with tamoxifen (P =.001) compared with the nonsignificant rise with vorozole. Twelve-week CTx values fell by 19% with tamoxifen (P =.006) and rose by 11% with vorozole (P =.15). CONCLUSION: The correlation with vorozole of Ki67 with volume and clinical response supports this as an intermediate marker. The nonsignificant effects on bone and lipid metabolism by the aromatase inhibitor may be important to consider for adjuvant and potential prevention strategies.
Authors: Julie A Theurer; William Stecho; John Yoo; Keith Kwan; Bret Wehrli; Vimla Harry; Morgan Black; Nicole Pinto; Eric Winquist; David Palma; Suzanne Richter; John W Barrett; S Danielle MacNeil; Kevin Fung; Christopher J Howlett; Anthony C Nichols Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Shirley W Flatt; Gail A Laughlin; Ellen B Gold; Cynthia A Thomson; Loki Natarajan; Lovell A Jones; Bette J Caan; Marcia L Stefanick; Richard A Hajek; Wael K Al-Delaimy; Frank Z Stanczyk; John P Pierce Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-03-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Laura M Spring; Arjun Gupta; Kerry L Reynolds; Michele A Gadd; Leif W Ellisen; Steven J Isakoff; Beverly Moy; Aditya Bardia Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Rita D Brandão; Jürgen Veeck; Koen K Van de Vijver; Patrick Lindsey; Bart de Vries; Catharina H M J van Elssen; Marinus J Blok; Kristien Keymeulen; Torik Ayoubi; Hubert J M Smeets; Vivianne C Tjan-Heijnen; Pierre S Hupperets Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 6.466