Literature DB >> 11844730

Motor cortex activation by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ataxia patients depends on the genetic defect.

Peter Schwenkreis1, Martin Tegenthoff, Katja Witscher, Christian Börnke, Horst Przuntek, Jean-Pierre Malin, Ludger Schöls.   

Abstract

In patients with degenerative ataxia, various abnormalities in motor cortex activation by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been observed, including a reduction of intracortical facilitation and a lengthening of the silent period. However, the groups of patients examined in previous studies were heterogeneous, involving patients with autosomal-dominant and idiopathic cerebellar ataxia, and showing different clinical features. The aim of our present study was to investigate whether differences in motor cortex activation by TMS could be observed in genetically defined subtypes of degenerative ataxia. We examined six patients with Friedreich's ataxia, three patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) type 1, seven patients with SCA2, 12 patients with SCA3, nine patients with SCA6 and 14 healthy controls. In all subjects, motor threshold, central motor conduction time, cortical silent period after TMS, and intracortical inhibition and facilitation (as assessed by TMS using a paired pulses paradigm) were determined. Additionally, F wave amplitudes evoked by electrical peripheral nerve stimulation were measured. We found a significant reduction of intracortical facilitation in SCA2 and SCA3 patients. Furthermore, motor threshold was elevated in SCA1, central motor conduction time was lengthened in patients with Friedreich's ataxia and SCA1, and F wave amplitudes were enlarged in all the genetic subgroups except for SCA6. Silent period and intracortical inhibition did not differ between patients and controls. We conclude that changes of intracortical facilitation induced by TMS and other excitability parameters of the motor system are not a common phenomenon in degenerative ataxia, but are restricted to specific subtypes. This points to differences in the underlying pathophysiological processes in genetic subtypes of ataxia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11844730     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  20 in total

Review 1.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Brigida Fierro; Giuseppe Giglia; Antonio Palermo; Carla Pecoraro; Simona Scalia; Filippo Brighina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Consensus Paper: Neurophysiological Assessments of Ataxias in Daily Practice.

Authors:  W Ilg; M Branscheidt; A Butala; P Celnik; L de Paola; F B Horak; L Schöls; H A G Teive; A P Vogel; D S Zee; D Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  Cortical excitability and neurology: insights into the pathophysiology.

Authors:  Radwa A B Badawy; Tobias Loetscher; Richard A L Macdonell; Amy Brodtmann
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

Review 6.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Regional patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, 3 and 6 : a voxel-based FDG-positron emission tomography analysis.

Authors:  Po-Shan Wang; Ren-Shyan Liu; Bang-Hung Yang; Bing-Wen Soong
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2).

Authors:  Isabel Lastres-Becker; Udo Rüb; Georg Auburger
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Electrophysiology in spinocerebellar ataxias: spread of disease and characteristic findings.

Authors:  Ludger Schöls; Christoph Linnemann; Christoph Globas
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Clinical and neurophysiological profile of four German families with spinocerebellar ataxia type 14.

Authors:  Christos Ganos; Simone Zittel; Martina Minnerop; Odette Schunke; Christina Heinbokel; Christian Gerloff; Christine Zühlke; Peter Bauer; Thomas Klockgether; Alexander Münchau; Tobias Bäumer
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.