OBJECTIVE: We compared the surgical results of simple encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) and EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis for the treatment of pediatric moyamoya disease. METHODS: Data for 159 children (up to 15 yr of age, 76 boys and 83 girls) who underwent indirect revascularization procedures for the treatment of moyamoya disease between 1987 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Group A patients underwent simple EDAS (n = 67). Group B patients underwent EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis (n = 92). The surgical results for each group were compared, in terms of clinical outcomes, neuroimaging changes, extent of revascularization evident on angiograms, and hemodynamic changes evident on single-photon emission computed tomographic scans. The average follow-up periods were 45 months for Group A and 22 months for Group B. RESULTS: The overall clinical outcomes and neuroimaging changes tended to be better for Group B. In terms of single-photon emission computed tomographic changes of the whole brain after surgery, Group B patients exhibited more favorable outcomes than did Group A patients (62 versus 36%, P = 0.003). The surgical results for the anterior cerebral artery territory were significantly better for Group B than for Group A, with respect to outcomes of anterior cerebral artery symptoms (81 versus 40%, P = 0.015), revascularization on angiograms (79 versus 16%, P < 0.001), and hemodynamic changes on single-photon emission computed tomographic scans (70 versus 52%, P = 0.002). The incidences of postoperative infarctions were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis is a more effective surgical modality for the treatment of pediatric moyamoya disease, compared with simple EDAS, because it covers both the middle cerebral artery and anterior cerebral artery territories of the brain.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the surgical results of simple encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) and EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis for the treatment of pediatric moyamoya disease. METHODS: Data for 159 children (up to 15 yr of age, 76 boys and 83 girls) who underwent indirect revascularization procedures for the treatment of moyamoya disease between 1987 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Group A patients underwent simple EDAS (n = 67). Group B patients underwent EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis (n = 92). The surgical results for each group were compared, in terms of clinical outcomes, neuroimaging changes, extent of revascularization evident on angiograms, and hemodynamic changes evident on single-photon emission computed tomographic scans. The average follow-up periods were 45 months for Group A and 22 months for Group B. RESULTS: The overall clinical outcomes and neuroimaging changes tended to be better for Group B. In terms of single-photon emission computed tomographic changes of the whole brain after surgery, Group B patients exhibited more favorable outcomes than did Group A patients (62 versus 36%, P = 0.003). The surgical results for the anterior cerebral artery territory were significantly better for Group B than for Group A, with respect to outcomes of anterior cerebral artery symptoms (81 versus 40%, P = 0.015), revascularization on angiograms (79 versus 16%, P < 0.001), and hemodynamic changes on single-photon emission computed tomographic scans (70 versus 52%, P = 0.002). The incidences of postoperative infarctions were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: EDAS with bifrontal encephalogaleo(periosteal)synangiosis is a more effective surgical modality for the treatment of pediatric moyamoya disease, compared with simple EDAS, because it covers both the middle cerebral artery and anterior cerebral artery territories of the brain.
Authors: Giuseppe Esposito; Annick Kronenburg; Jorn Fierstra; Kees P J Braun; Catharina J M Klijn; Albert van der Zwan; Luca Regli Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: H-H Cho; J-E Cheon; S-K Kim; Y H Choi; I-O Kim; W S Kim; S-M Lee; S K You; S-M Shin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ho Jun Seol; Kyu-Chang Wang; Seung-Ki Kim; Chang Sub Lee; Dong Soo Lee; In-One Kim; Byung-Kyu Cho Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 1.475