Literature DB >> 11844037

Environmental damage and occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives.

A U J Yap1, C L Chew, L F K L Ong, S H Teoh.   

Abstract

The chemical environment is one aspect of the oral environment, which could have an appreciable influence on the in-vivo degradation of composite resins. The resin matrix can be softened and fillers constituents can be leached out when composites are exposed to certain chemicals/food-simulating liquids (FSLs). A reciprocal compression sliding wear device was used to study the effects of the chemical environment on occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of four composite restoratives (Silux Plus, Z100, Ariston pHc and Surefil). The effects of FSL on hardness was also investigated and correlated to wear. Thirty-six hardness/wear specimens of each material were made and stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 24 h. The specimens were then divided into six groups of six specimens and stored in the following FSL for 1 week at 37 degrees C: distilled water (W), 0.02 N citric acid (C), 0.02 N lactic acid (L), heptane (H) and 75-25% ethanol-water solution (E). Conditioning in artificial saliva (S) was used as control. After conditioning, the specimens were wear tested at 20 MPa contact stress against SS304 counter-bodies in the respective FSL/artificial saliva up to 20 000 cycles. Wear depth (lm, n=6) was measured using profilometry. Change in hardness (DeltaKHN, Knoop hardness number) was determined by microhardness testing pre- and post-conditioning. Results of statistical analyses (ANOVA/Scheffe's at significance level 0.05) of wear data were as follows: Silux - S, W > L, H, E and C, L > H; Z100 - S, W > all other mediums and E > H; Ariston - all other mediums > H; Surefil - W, C > S, L, H, E (> indicates significantly more wear). With the exception of Surefil, the greatest wear was observed with conditioning and wear testing in water. This ranged from 93.18 +/- 21.96 lm for Z100 to 31.43 +/- 2.80 lm for Surefil. For all materials, conditioning in heptane resulted in the least wear. This ranged from 8.9 +/- 2.2 microm for Ariston to 16.5 +/- 5.9 lm for Silux. The effects of the different FSL on OCA wear were material dependent. No correlation was observed between DeltaKHN and wear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11844037     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00797.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  9 in total

1.  Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Ernst; Mathias Brandenbusch; Gerrit Meyer; Kerem Canbek; Franziska Gottschalk; Brita Willershausen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Shear punch strength evaluation of nanocomposite and compomer, post-conditioning in dietary solvents - An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Harsimran Kaur; Harpreet Singh; K S Vinod; Baldeep Singh; Rachita Arora; Sayan Chatopaddhya
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-03-27

3.  Effect of organic acids in dental biofilm on microhardness of a silorane-based composite.

Authors:  Sedighe Sadat Hashemikamangar; Seyed Jalal Pourhashemi; Mohammad Talebi; Nazanin Kiomarsi; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2015-06-02

4.  Effect of Food Simulating Agents on the Hardness and Bond Strength of a Silicone Soft Liner to a Denture Base Acrylic Resin.

Authors:  A A R Khaledi; M Bahrani; S Shirzadi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-23

5.  Effect of Acidic Beverages on Color Stability and Microhardness of Various Esthetic Restorative Materials: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Aradhana Rathod; Suneel V Vadavadagi; Tanya Verma; Pawan Kumar; Potluri Venkataratna Deepak; Saikat Deb; Azhar Iqbal
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

6.  In Vitro Solubility and Wear Rates of Silorane and Dimethacrylate Resin Based Composite Restorative Materials under Different pH Conditions.

Authors:  Tarek A Soliman; Khalid M Tubaigy; Eman M Raffat; Ebaa I Al-Agha
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015

7.  Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period.

Authors:  Ugur Erdemir; Esra Yildiz; Meltem Mert Eren; Sevda Ozel
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Effect of dietary solvents on the strength of nanocomposite, compomer, glass ionomer cement: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Harsimran Kaur; B Nandlal
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11

9.  New Resin-Based Bulk-Fill Composites: in vitro Evaluation of Micro-Hardness and Depth of Cure as Infection Risk Indexes.

Authors:  Marco Colombo; Simone Gallo; Claudio Poggio; Vittorio Ricaldone; Carla Renata Arciola; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.