Literature DB >> 11843761

Low-flux versus high-flux synthetic dialysis membrane in acute renal failure: prospective randomized study.

J B Ponikvar1, R R Rus, R B Kenda, A F Bren, R R Ponikvar.   

Abstract

The influence of dialyzer membrane on the morbidity and mortality of patients with acute renal failure remains a matter of debate. The aim of the prospective randomized clinical study was to assess the influence of the flux of a synthetic dialyzer membrane on patients' survival rate, restitution of renal function, and duration of hemodialysis treatment of patients with acute renal failure as a part of multiorgan failure. Seventy-two patients treated in intensive care units of the University Medical Center Ljubljana were randomized according to the dialyzer used throughout the duration of hemodialysis treatment. There were 38 patients in the low-flux group (dialyzer F6, low-flux polysuphone, Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany) and 34 patients in the high-flux group (dialyzer Filtral 12, sulphonated high-flux polyacrylonitrile, Hospal, Industrie Meyzieu, France). Both groups were balanced in terms of sex, age, APACHE II score, oliguria before dialysis, cause of acute renal failure, inotropic support, mechanical ventilation, and the number of failing organs. The patients' survival rate was 18.7% in the low-flux group and 20.6% in the high-flux group. Ten patients (26.3%) recovered their renal function in the low-flux group and 8 (23.5%) in the high-flux group. Hemodialysis treatment lasted 11.2 days in the low-flux and 10.7 days in the high-flux group. An analysis of subgroups with a lower mortality rate (subgroup of patients without oliguria and subgroup of patients with less than 4 failed organ systems) did not show significant differences between the low-flux and high-flux groups in terms of survival rate, recovery of renal function, and duration of hemodialysis treatment. In conclusion, no significant differences were found in the results of low-flux versus high-flux synthetic membrane dialyzer treatment in patients with acute renal failure as a part of multiorgan failure in terms of survival rate, recovery of renal function, incidence of oliguria during hemodialysis, and duration of hemodialysis treatment. The number of failing organs seems to be the most important single factor determining the survival of patients with acute renal failure as a part of multiorgan failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11843761     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.06753.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  12 in total

Review 1.  Dialysis modalities for the management of pediatric acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Lara de Galasso; Stefano Picca; Isabella Guzzo
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  Choice of renal replacement therapy modality and dialysis dependence after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antoine G Schneider; Rinaldo Bellomo; Sean M Bagshaw; Neil J Glassford; Serigne Lo; Min Jun; Alan Cass; Martin Gallagher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  C Morath; N Miftari; R Dikow; C Hainer; M Zeier; V Schwenger; M A Weigand
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

5.  The Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2018-08-13

Review 6.  The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Platelet Consumption and Filter Clotting Using Two Different Membrane Sizes during Continuous Venovenous Haemodiafiltration in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Francesca Bonassin Tempesta; Alain Rudiger; Marco Previsdomini; Marco Maggiorini
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2014-04-27

8.  High-flux and low-flux membranes: efficacy in hemodialysis.

Authors:  Khodayar Oshvandi; Rasol Kavyannejad; Sayed Reza Borzuo; Mahmoud Gholyaf
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2014-09-20

Review 9.  Biocompatible hemodialysis membranes for acute renal failure.

Authors:  A Alonso; J Lau; B L Jaber
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

10.  Sustained low efficiency dialysis using a single-pass batch system in acute kidney injury - a randomized interventional trial: the REnal Replacement Therapy Study in Intensive Care Unit PatiEnts.

Authors:  Vedat Schwenger; Markus A Weigand; Oskar Hoffmann; Ralf Dikow; Lars P Kihm; Jörg Seckinger; Nexhat Miftari; Matthias Schaier; Stefan Hofer; Caroline Haar; Peter P Nawroth; Martin Zeier; Eike Martin; Christian Morath
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.