Nilesh Raman Vasan1, Scott Stevenson, Mark Ward. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle St, Glasgow G4 0SF, Scotland, UK. nileshvasan@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of preincisional bupivacaine hydrochloride infiltration on postoperative pain after tonsillectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING:A secondary/tertiary referral center in Christchurch, New Zealand. PATIENTS: A volunteer sample of 70 patients, aged 16 to 42 years, with recurrent tonsillitis. Seven patients were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: After randomization, one group received 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride in the peritonsillar space, with the patient under general anesthesia. The other group received 5 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution, with the patient under general anesthesia. Both groups underwent surgery with a standardized surgical and anesthetic technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative pain was assessed with a visual analog scale at 15 minutes and 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24 hours after the procedure. Postoperative analgesic requirement, length of admission, and antiemetic requirement were also assessed. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups for postoperative pain by means of the visual analog scale at any time interval, nor was any statistical difference found for the other variables measured. A trend toward less pain in the immediate postoperative period in the group receiving bupivacaine was noted. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant benefit is found for use of preincisional bupivacaine in tonsillectomy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of preincisional bupivacaine hydrochloride infiltration on postoperative pain after tonsillectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: A secondary/tertiary referral center in Christchurch, New Zealand. PATIENTS: A volunteer sample of 70 patients, aged 16 to 42 years, with recurrent tonsillitis. Seven patients were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: After randomization, one group received 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride in the peritonsillar space, with the patient under general anesthesia. The other group received 5 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution, with the patient under general anesthesia. Both groups underwent surgery with a standardized surgical and anesthetic technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative pain was assessed with a visual analog scale at 15 minutes and 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24 hours after the procedure. Postoperative analgesic requirement, length of admission, and antiemetic requirement were also assessed. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups for postoperative pain by means of the visual analog scale at any time interval, nor was any statistical difference found for the other variables measured. A trend toward less pain in the immediate postoperative period in the group receiving bupivacaine was noted. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant benefit is found for use of preincisional bupivacaine in tonsillectomy.
Authors: Montasir Junaid; Muhammad Sohail Halim; Maisam Abbas Shiraz Onali; Sadaf Qadeer; Hareem Usman Khan; Naeem Sultan Ali Journal: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-11-04