How do we diagnose syncope?

INTRODUCTION: The Eastbourne Syncope Assessment Study aims to increase diagnostic yield in unexplained syncope while reducing investigational costs. The initial study phase was a retrospective analysis of every presentation to the Eastbourne General Hospital (a busy nontertiary center in the United Kingdom serving a population of 250,000; 24% are older than 65 years) with syncope for the year 1998. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 1,334 cases with syncopal codes were identified. Six hundred sixty patients (mean age 64 years) had actually suffered an episode of syncope. Forty percent had recurrent syncope, with a mean of 4.7 previous episodes. Twenty-nine percent of syncope cases remained undiagnosed. Forty-four percent were diagnosed as vasovagal, 12% neurologic, 6% due to an arrhythmia, 2% drug related, and 2% due to hemorrhage. Thirteen different types of investigation were undertaken, with an overall total of 3,264 investigations performed at a cost of Pound Sterling 104,285. Diagnosis was achieved by history and examination alone in 61% of cases. Excluding history and examination, the most cost-effective diagnostic tools were the 7-day patient-activated recorder (R test) and tilt testing (Pound Sterling 260 and Pound Sterling 401 per diagnosis, respectively). Investigations also were graded by their relative diagnostic power. Hospital admission alone accounted for 67% of the cost of investigating syncope.
CONCLUSION: In syncope, diagnostic rates can be improved and investigational costs reduced by concentrating on the most specific, sensitive, and cost-effective investigations and by minimizing hospital stay. Such a protocol currently is under investigation at our institution.