Literature DB >> 11843458

Geographic differences in implantable cardioverter defibrillator usage.

Karlheinz Seidl1, Jochen Senges.   

Abstract

Despite the demonstrated efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in reducing sudden and total mortality in selected patients, their implantation rates vary greatly among countries. In the United States, the implantation rate is 185 implants per million inhabitants compared with only 31 implants per million in western Europe. The differences in ICD use may be explained by the following factors: manner in which sudden cardiac death is perceived by politicians and physicians (sudden cardiac death is perceived as a "nice way of dying"); differences in indications; physicians' information; prevalence of coronary artery disease; sudden cardiac death survival rates; perceived reliability of alternative treatment (namely, antiarrhythmics including amiodarone); economic backgrounds; and health care politics. Furthermore, the cost of this treatment strategy must be considered. This issue has been raised because generalization of ICD use in patients matching clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in the primary prevention trials may represent a significant economic burden to be added to the already overloaded health care system. This low acceptance may not be entirely related to budget constraint but also to the perceived efficacy of ICDs by physicians and health authorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11843458     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2002.tb01961.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

1.  [MADIT II--or how seriously do we take primary prevention of sudden cardiac death?].

Authors:  Helmut U Klein
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Regional variation in ICD implantation rates: the shocking truth?

Authors:  C C Lang
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators: even better than we thought?

Authors:  Una Buckley; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  [The impact of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II in a university hospital--do all patients with myocardial infarction and reduced left ventricular function need an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?].

Authors:  Peter Lercher; Brigitte Rotman; Daniel Scherr; Wilfried Kraxner; Olef Luha; Werner Klein
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up.

Authors:  M J Pekka Raatikainen; Paavo Uusimaa; Mireille M E van Ginneken; Jacques P G Janssen; Markku Linnaluoto
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 5.214

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.