Literature DB >> 11843249

Randomised trial of SIR-Spheres plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for treating patients with liver metastases from primary large bowel cancer.

B Gray1, G Van Hazel, M Hope, M Burton, P Moroz, J Anderson, V Gebski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: SIR-Spheres are radioactive yttrium90 microspheres (SIR-Spheres, Sirtex Medical Limited, Australia) used to selectively target high levels of ionising radiation to tumors within the liver. This trial was designed to measure any increased patient benefit by adding a single administration of SIR-Spheres to a regimen of regional hepatic artery chemotherapy (HAC) administered as a 12 day infusion of floxuridine and repeated at monthly intervals, vs. the same chemotherapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase III randomised clinical trial entering 74 patients was undertaken on patients with bi-lobar non-resectable liver metastases from primary adenocarcinoma of the large bowel. Patient benefit criteria assessed in the trial were tumor response, time to disease progression in the liver, overall survival, quality of life, and treatment related toxicity. Tumor response was measured by serial changes in both cross-sectional tumor areas and total tumor volumes, provided any response lasted not less than three months as well as changes in serum carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA).
RESULTS: The partial and complete response rate (PR + CR) was significantly greater for patients receiving SIR-Spheres when measured by tumor areas (44%) vs. 17.6%, P = 0.01) tumor volumes (50% vs. 24%, P = 0.03) and CEA (72% vs. 47%, P = 0.004). The median time to disease progression in the liver was significantly longer for patients receiving SIR-Spheres in comparison to patients receiving HAC alone when measured by either tumor areas (9.7 vs. 15.9 months, P = 0.001), tumor volumes (7.6 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.04) or CEA (5.7 vs. 6.7 months, P = 0.06). The one, two, three and five-year survival for patients receiving SIR-Spheres was 72%, 39%, 17% and 3.5%, compared to 68%, 29%, 6.5% and 0% for HAC alone. Cox regression analysis suggests an improvement in survival for patients treated with SIR-Spheres who survive more than 15 months (P = 0.06). There was no increase in grade 3-4 treatment related toxicity and no loss of quality of life for patients receiving SIR-Spheres in comparison to patients receiving HAC alone.
CONCLUSION: The combination of a single injection of SIR-Spheres plus HAC is substantially more effective in increasing tumor responses and progression free survival than the same regimen of HAC alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11843249     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013569329846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  130 in total

Review 1.  Radioembolization for primary and metastatic liver cancer.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Ahsun Riaz; Mary F Mulcahy; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and microsphere embolization for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Xie; Jiajie Zang; Xiaojing Guo; Feng Xu; Rongxi Shen; Long Yan; Jiamei Yang; Jia He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  [Intra-arterial treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma].

Authors:  O Pellerin; J-F Geschwind
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 4.  Chemoembolization and radioembolization for metastatic disease to the liver: available data and future studies.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

Review 5.  [Interventional procedures for hepatic metastases].

Authors:  T Helmberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Occupational radiation exposure of medical staff performing ⁹⁰Y-loaded microsphere radioembolization.

Authors:  Sophie Laffont; Yan Rolland; Valérie Ardisson; Julien Edeline; Marc Pracht; Samuel Le Sourd; Tanguy Rohou; Laurence Lenoir; Nicolas Lepareur; Etienne Garin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Radioembolization as a Salvage Therapy for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors That Affect Outcomes.

Authors:  Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena G Violari; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Waleed Shady; Mithat Gonen; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Elena N Petre; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Richard K Do; Michael I D'Angelica; Joseph R Osborne; Neil H Segal; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Nancy E Kemeny
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  [Liver tumor ablation].

Authors:  Th Helmberger; R-Th Hoffmann; T Jakobs; Th Leibecke; A Lubienski; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Intrahepatic therapy for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kerlijne De Groote; Hans Prenen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 10.  Liver embolizations in oncology. A review. Part II. Arterial radioembolizations, portal venous embolizations, experimental arterial embolization procedures.

Authors:  Peter Gunvén
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.