Literature DB >> 11842706

Falls Clinics in Australia: a survey of current practice, and recommendations for future development.

K Hill1, R Smith, J Schwarz.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify common themes and differences in structure and function of Falls Clinics in Australia, to provide a framework for planning future activity. A paper-based survey was circulated to 20 identified Falls Clinic services throughout Australia in late 2000. Fifteen responses (75%) were received, although two of the 15 Clinics were not operating at the time of the survey, and so their responses were not included. Nine of the Clinics had commenced operation since 1998. Staffing commonly included a physiotherapist, geriatrician, and an occupational therapist, with the comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment process taking an average of 130 minutes. Although standard assessment tools were used by more than half of the Clinics, there were no universally applied assessment tools. Waiting lists for initial assessments ranged up to 16 weeks (average 6 weeks). Most Clinics instituted a number of management options themselves, but also used a range of existing community services to provide some of the planned interventions. Limited formal evaluation of the effectiveness of Clinics was reported. Recommended future activity included increasing staff levels and operating times for Clinics to more adequately meet identified need, increased networking and data sharing between Clinics, and a greater emphasis on research and staff training. We conclude that the recent increase in the number of Falls Clinics around Australia has occurred in a relatively unstructured manner, with many differences in staffing, operation and evaluation. There is a need for improved communication and standardisation of core procedures and assessment tools to facilitate best practice in all Clinics, and to provide a framework for a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of Falls Clinics in Australia.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11842706     DOI: 10.1071/ah010163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  4 in total

1.  Community-dwelling seniors who present to the emergency department with a fall do not receive Guideline care and their fall risk profile worsens significantly: a 6-month prospective study.

Authors:  A E Salter; K M Khan; M G Donaldson; J C Davis; J Buchanan; R B Abu-Laban; W L Cook; S R Lord; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  What factors influence community-dwelling older people's intent to undertake multifactorial fall prevention programs?

Authors:  Keith D Hill; Lesley Day; Terry P Haines
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Falls and potential therapeutic interventions among elderly and older adult patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Walid Kamal Abdelbasset; Gopal Nambi; Shereen H Elsayed; Ahmad M Osailan; Marwa M Eid
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 4.  Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia.

Authors:  Fernando Gomez; Carmen Lucia Curcio; Pushpa Suriyaarachchi; Oddom Demontiero; Gustavo Duque
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.458

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.